| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
|
|
|
Users can specify the path a raw profile is written to by passing
-fprofile-instr-generate=<path>, but this functionality broke on Darwin
after __llvm_profile_filename was made weak [1], resulting in profiles
being written to "default.profraw" even when <path> is specified.
The situation is that instrumented programs provide a weak definition of
__llvm_profile_filename, which conflicts with a weak redefinition
provided by the profiling runtime.
The linker appears to pick the 'winning' definition arbitrarily: on
Darwin, it usually prefers the larger definition, which is probably why
the instrprof-override-filename.c test has been passing.
The fix is to move the runtime's definition into a separate object file
within the archive. This means that the linker won't "see" the runtime's
definition unless the user program has not provided one. I couldn't
think of a great way to test this other than to mimic the Darwin
failure: use -fprofile-instr-generate=<some-small-path>.
Testing: check-{clang,profile}, modified instrprof-override-filename.c.
[1] [Profile] deprecate __llvm_profile_override_default_filename
https://reviews.llvm.org/D22613
https://reviews.llvm.org/D22614
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34797
llvm-svn: 306710
|
