| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Use the uniform single line C++/99 style for code comments.
This is part of the cleanup proposed in "[RFC] compiler-rt builtins
cleanup and refactoring".
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60352
llvm-svn: 359411
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
to reflect the new license. These used slightly different spellings that
defeated my regular expressions.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351648
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 248330
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
available.
This should fix the bots broken by r248322.
Reviewed by bogner over my shoulder.
llvm-svn: 248328
|
|
|
Talking to John and Doug, we concluded that these functions from
stdatomic really do belong here in compiler-rt rather than in libc,
since the compiler owns stdatomic.h and these need to refer to
clang-specific builtins. Nonetheless, I've only added these on darwin
for now - other platforms should probably do the same unless their
libc does implement these functions.
llvm-svn: 236805
|
