| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
I'd like to add these comments to warn others of problems I
encountered when trying to use `RemoveLineIfEmpty`. I originally
tried to fix the problem, but I realized I could implement the
functionality more easily and efficiently in my calling code where I
can make the simplifying assumption that there are no prior edits to
the line from which text is being removed. While I've lost the
motivation to write a fix, which doesn't look easy, I figure a warning
to others is better than silence.
I've added a unit test to demonstrate the problem. I don't know how
to mark it as an expected failure, so I just marked it disabled.
Reviewed By: jkorous
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61466
llvm-svn: 369049
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-ppc64le-linux-multistage/builds/10272
llvm-svn: 365264
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-ppc64le-linux-multistage/builds/10270
llvm-svn: 365263
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Some Rewrite functions are already overloaded to accept
CharSourceRange, and this extends others in the same manner. I'm
calling these in code that's not ready to upstream, but I figure they
might be useful to others in the meantime.
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61467
llvm-svn: 365258
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Setting CLANG_LINK_CLANG_DYLIB=ON causes clang tools to link against
libclang_shared.so instead of the individual component libraries.
Reviewers: mgorny, beanz, smeenai, phosek, sylvestre.ledru
Subscribers: arphaman, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63503
llvm-svn: 365092
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We currently use target_link_libraries without an explicit scope
specifier (INTERFACE, PRIVATE or PUBLIC) when linking executables.
Dependencies added in this way apply to both the target and its
dependencies, i.e. they become part of the executable's link interface
and are transitive.
Transitive dependencies generally don't make sense for executables,
since you wouldn't normally be linking against an executable. This also
causes issues for generating install export files when using
LLVM_DISTRIBUTION_COMPONENTS. For example, clang has a lot of LLVM
library dependencies, which are currently added as interface
dependencies. If clang is in the distribution components but the LLVM
libraries it depends on aren't (which is a perfectly legitimate use case
if the LLVM libraries are being built static and there are therefore no
run-time dependencies on them), CMake will complain about the LLVM
libraries not being in export set when attempting to generate the
install export file for clang. This is reasonable behavior on CMake's
part, and the right thing is for LLVM's build system to explicitly use
PRIVATE dependencies for executables.
Unfortunately, CMake doesn't allow you to mix and match the keyword and
non-keyword target_link_libraries signatures for a single target; i.e.,
if a single call to target_link_libraries for a particular target uses
one of the INTERFACE, PRIVATE, or PUBLIC keywords, all other calls must
also be updated to use those keywords. This means we must do this change
in a single shot. I also fully expect to have missed some instances; I
tested by enabling all the projects in the monorepo (except dragonegg),
and configuring both with and without shared libraries, on both Darwin
and Linux, but I'm planning to rely on the buildbots for other
configurations (since it should be pretty easy to fix those).
Even after this change, we still have a lot of target_link_libraries
calls that don't specify a scope keyword, mostly for shared libraries.
I'm thinking about addressing those in a follow-up, but that's a
separate change IMO.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40823
llvm-svn: 319840
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This patch is provided in preparation for removing autoconf on 1/26. The proposal to remove autoconf on 1/26 was discussed on the llvm-dev thread here: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-January/093875.html
"This is the way [autoconf] ends
Not with a bang but a whimper."
-T.S. Eliot
Reviewers: chandlerc, grosbach, bob.wilson, echristo
Subscribers: klimek, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16472
llvm-svn: 258862
|
|
|
llvm-svn: 231588
|
