| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
exactly the same as clang's existing [[clang::fallthrough]] attribute, which
has been updated to have the same semantics. The one significant difference
is that [[fallthrough]] is ill-formed if it's not used immediately before a
switch label (even when -Wimplicit-fallthrough is disabled). To support that,
we now build a CFG of any function that uses a '[[fallthrough]];' statement
to check.
In passing, fix some bugs with our support for statement attributes -- in
particular, diagnose their use on declarations, rather than asserting.
llvm-svn: 262881
|
|
|
Summary:
When issuing a diagnostic message for the -Wimplicit-fallthrough diagnostics, always try to find the latest macro, defined at the point of fallthrough, which is immediately expanded to "[[clang::fallthrough]]", and use it's name instead of the actual sequence.
Known issues:
* uses PP.getSpelling() to compare macro definition with a string (anyone can suggest a convenient way to fill a token array, or maybe lex it in runtime?);
* this can be generalized and used in other similar cases, any ideas where it should reside then?
Reviewers: doug.gregor, rsmith
Reviewed By: rsmith
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D50
llvm-svn: 164858
|
