| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
explicit functions that are not candidates.
It's not always obvious that the reason a conversion was not possible is
because the function you wanted to call is 'explicit', so explicitly say
if that's the case.
It would be nice to rank the explicit candidates higher in the
diagnostic if an implicit conversion sequence exists for their
arguments, but unfortunately we can't determine that without potentially
triggering non-immediate-context errors that we're not permitted to
produce.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Patch by Tyker!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60934
llvm-svn: 360311
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This caused Clang to start erroring on the following:
struct S {
template <typename = int> explicit S();
};
struct T : S {};
struct U : T {
U();
};
U::U() {}
$ clang -c /tmp/x.cc
/tmp/x.cc:10:4: error: call to implicitly-deleted default constructor of 'T'
U::U() {}
^
/tmp/x.cc:5:12: note: default constructor of 'T' is implicitly deleted
because base class 'S' has no default constructor
struct T : S {};
^
1 error generated.
See discussion on the cfe-commits email thread.
This also reverts the follow-ups r359966 and r359968.
> this patch adds support for the explicit bool specifier.
>
> Changes:
> - The parsing for the explicit(bool) specifier was added in ParseDecl.cpp.
> - The storage of the explicit specifier was changed. the explicit specifier was stored as a boolean value in the FunctionDeclBitfields and in the DeclSpec class. now it is stored as a PointerIntPair<Expr*, 2> with a flag and a potential expression in CXXConstructorDecl, CXXDeductionGuideDecl, CXXConversionDecl and in the DeclSpec class.
> - Following the AST change, Serialization, ASTMatchers, ASTComparator and ASTPrinter were adapted.
> - Template instantiation was adapted to instantiate the potential expressions of the explicit(bool) specifier When instantiating their associated declaration.
> - The Add*Candidate functions were adapted, they now take a Boolean indicating if the context allowing explicit constructor or conversion function and this boolean is used to remove invalid overloads that required template instantiation to be detected.
> - Test for Semantic and Serialization were added.
>
> This patch is not yet complete. I still need to check that interaction with CTAD and deduction guides is correct. and add more tests for AST operations. But I wanted first feedback.
> Perhaps this patch should be spited in smaller patches, but making each patch testable as a standalone may be tricky.
>
> Patch by Tyker
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60934
llvm-svn: 360024
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
this patch adds support for the explicit bool specifier.
Changes:
- The parsing for the explicit(bool) specifier was added in ParseDecl.cpp.
- The storage of the explicit specifier was changed. the explicit specifier was stored as a boolean value in the FunctionDeclBitfields and in the DeclSpec class. now it is stored as a PointerIntPair<Expr*, 2> with a flag and a potential expression in CXXConstructorDecl, CXXDeductionGuideDecl, CXXConversionDecl and in the DeclSpec class.
- Following the AST change, Serialization, ASTMatchers, ASTComparator and ASTPrinter were adapted.
- Template instantiation was adapted to instantiate the potential expressions of the explicit(bool) specifier When instantiating their associated declaration.
- The Add*Candidate functions were adapted, they now take a Boolean indicating if the context allowing explicit constructor or conversion function and this boolean is used to remove invalid overloads that required template instantiation to be detected.
- Test for Semantic and Serialization were added.
This patch is not yet complete. I still need to check that interaction with CTAD and deduction guides is correct. and add more tests for AST operations. But I wanted first feedback.
Perhaps this patch should be spited in smaller patches, but making each patch testable as a standalone may be tricky.
Patch by Tyker
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60934
llvm-svn: 359949
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
overlooked a few things, but this implementation comes straight from the DR resolution itself.
llvm-svn: 227224
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
before retrying the initialization to produce diagnostics. Otherwise, we may
fail to produce any diagnostics, and silently produce invalid AST in a -Asserts
build. Also add a note to this codepath to make it more clear why we were
trying to create a temporary.
llvm-svn: 217197
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 201100
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch fixes PR8264. Duplicate qualifiers already are diagnozed,
now the same diagnostics is issued for duplicate function specifiers.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2025
llvm-svn: 194559
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
an additional conversion (other than a qualification conversion) would be
required after the explicit conversion.
Conversely, do allow explicit conversion functions to be used when initializing
a temporary for a reference binding in direct-list-initialization.
llvm-svn: 191150
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
common function. The C++1y contextual implicit conversion rules themselves are
not yet implemented, however.
This also fixes a subtle bug where template instantiation context notes were
dropped for diagnostics coming from conversions for integral constant
expressions -- we were implicitly slicing a SemaDiagnosticBuilder into a
DiagnosticBuilder when producing these diagnostics, and losing their context
notes in the process.
llvm-svn: 182406
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 166619
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
explicit conversion functions to initialize the argument to a
copy/move constructor that itself is the subject of direct
initialization. Since we don't have that much context in overload
resolution, we end up threading more flags :(.
Fixes <rdar://problem/10903741> / PR10456.
llvm-svn: 151409
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
diagnostic message are compared. If either is a substring of the other, then
no error is given. This gives rise to an unexpected case:
// expect-error{{candidate function has different number of parameters}}
will match the following error messages from Clang:
candidate function has different number of parameters (expected 1 but has 2)
candidate function has different number of parameters
It will also match these other error messages:
candidate function
function has different number of parameters
number of parameters
This patch will change so that the verification string must be a substring of
the diagnostic message before accepting. Also, all the failing tests from this
change have been corrected. Some stats from this cleanup:
87 - removed extra spaces around verification strings
70 - wording updates to diagnostics
40 - extra leading or trailing characters (typos, unmatched parens or quotes)
35 - diagnostic level was included (error:, warning:, or note:)
18 - flag name put in the warning (-Wprotocol)
llvm-svn: 146619
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
-std=c++0x. Patch by Ahmed Charles!
llvm-svn: 141900
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This makes the code duplication of implicit special member handling even worse,
but the cleanup will have to come later. For now, this works.
Follow-up with tests for explicit defaulting and enabling the __has_feature
flag to come.
llvm-svn: 138821
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
considering explicit conversion operators when determining surrogate
functions. Fixes PR10453. Note that there are a few test cases where
Clang is still wrong because it does not implement DR899; see PR10456.
Patch by Jonathan Sauer!
llvm-svn: 135857
|
|
|
marked as 'explicit', but then defined out-of-line, we would not treat it as being explicit.
llvm-svn: 94366
|
