| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
As discussed in D64780 the wording of this warning message is being
changed to say 'is not supported' instead of 'ignored', and the
diag ID itself is being changed to warn_cconv_not_supported.
llvm-svn: 366368
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
After https://reviews.llvm.org/rL355317 we noticed that quite a decent
amount of code redeclares builtins (memcpy in particular, I believe
reduced from an MSVC header) with a calling convention specified.
This gets particularly troublesome when the user specifies a new
'default' calling convention on the command line.
When looking to add a diagnostic for this case, it was noticed that we
had 3 other diagnostics that differed only slightly. This patch ALSO
unifies those under a 'select'. Unfortunately, the order of words in
ONE of these diagnostics was reversed ("'thiscall' calling convention"
vs "calling convention 'thiscall'"), so this patch also standardizes on
the former.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59560
Change-Id: I79f99fe7c2301640755ffdd774b46eb44526bb22
llvm-svn: 356663
|
|
|
Summary:
When compiling device code, we may still see host code with explicit
calling conventions. NVPTX needs to claim that it supports these CCs,
so that (a) we don't raise noisy warnings, and (b) we don't break
existing code which relies on the existence of these CCs when
specializing templates. (If a CC doesn't exist, clang ignores it, so
two template specializations which are different only insofar as one
specifies a CC are considered identical and therefore are an error if
that CC is not supported.)
Reviewers: tra
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28323
llvm-svn: 291136
|
