| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The attribute pass_dynamic_object_size(n) behaves exactly like
pass_object_size(n), but instead of evaluating __builtin_object_size on calls,
it evaluates __builtin_dynamic_object_size, which has the potential to produce
runtime code when the object size can't be determined statically.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58757
llvm-svn: 356515
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch allows us to perform incompatible pointer conversions when
resolving overloads in C. So, the following code will no longer fail to
compile (though it will still emit warnings, assuming the user hasn't
opted out of them):
```
void foo(char *) __attribute__((overloadable));
void foo(int) __attribute__((overloadable));
void callFoo() {
unsigned char bar[128];
foo(bar); // selects the char* overload.
}
```
These conversions are ranked below all others, so:
A. Any other viable conversion will win out
B. If we had another incompatible pointer conversion in the example
above (e.g. `void foo(int *)`), we would complain about
an ambiguity.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24113
llvm-svn: 280553
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Also includes a minor ``enable_if`` docs update.
Currently, our address-of overload machinery will only allow implicit
conversions of overloaded functions to void* in C. For example:
```
void f(int) __attribute__((overloadable));
void f(double) __attribute__((overloadable, enable_if(0, "")));
void *fp = f; // OK. This is C and the target is void*.
void (*fp2)(void) = f; // Error. This is C, but the target isn't void*.
```
This patch makes the assignment of `fp2` select the `f(int)` overload,
rather than emitting an error (N.B. you'll still get a warning about the
`fp2` assignment if you use -Wincompatible-pointer-types).
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13704
llvm-svn: 264132
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Given an expression like `(&Foo)();`, we perform overload resolution as
if we are calling `Foo` directly. This causes problems if `Foo` is a
function that can't have its address taken. This patch teaches overload
resolution to ignore functions that can't have their address taken in
such cases.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15590
llvm-svn: 257016
|
|
|
These additions were meant to go in as a part of r254554; while it's
certainly nice to have new functionality, it's nicer if we have tests to
go with it. :)
llvm-svn: 254632
|
