| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33816
llvm-svn: 307175
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Correct class-template deprecation behavior
Based on the comment in the test, and my reading of the standard, a deprecated warning should be issued in the following case:
template<typename T> [[deprecated]] class Foo{}; Foo<int> f;
This was not the case, because the ClassTemplateSpecializationDecl creation did not also copy the deprecated attribute.
Note: I did NOT audit the complete set of attributes to see WHICH ones should be copied, so instead I simply copy ONLY the deprecated attribute.
Previous DiffRev: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27486, was reverted.
This patch fixes the issues brought up here by the reverter: https://reviews.llvm.org/rL298410
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31245
llvm-svn: 298634
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This reverts commit r298410 (which produces incorrect warnings, see
comments on https://reviews.llvm.org/rL298410).
llvm-svn: 298504
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This reverts commit r298433. (Required to revert r298410, see comments
there.)
llvm-svn: 298503
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 298433
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Based on the comment in the test, and my reading of the standard, a deprecated warning should be issued in the following case:
template<typename T> [[deprecated]] class Foo{}; Foo<int> f;
This was not the case, because the ClassTemplateSpecializationDecl creation did not also copy the deprecated attribute.
Note: I did NOT audit the complete set of attributes to see WHICH ones should be copied, so instead I simply copy ONLY the deprecated attribute.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27486
llvm-svn: 298410
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Patch by Douglas Yung!
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19003
llvm-svn: 267772
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is long-since overdue, and matches GCC 5.0. This should also be
backwards-compatible, because we already supported all of C11 as an extension
in C99 mode.
llvm-svn: 220244
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
'deprecated'.
Fixes <rdar://problem/15584219> and <rdar://problem/12241361>.
This change looks large, but all it does is reuse and consolidate
the delayed diagnostic logic for deprecation warnings with unavailability
warnings. By doing so, it showed various inconsistencies between the
diagnostics, which were close, but not consistent. It also revealed
some missing "note:"'s in the deprecated diagnostics that were showing
up in the unavailable diagnostics, etc.
This change also changes the wording of the core deprecation diagnostics.
Instead of saying "function has been explicitly marked deprecated"
we now saw "'X' has been been explicitly marked deprecated". It
turns out providing a bit more context is useful, and often we
got the actual term wrong or it was not very precise
(e.g., "function" instead of "destructor"). By just saying the name
of the thing that is deprecated/deleted/unavailable we define
this issue away. This diagnostic can likely be further wordsmithed
to be shorter.
llvm-svn: 197627
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Not completely sure this is right, but it's clearly better than what
we did before this commit (effectively dropping the attribute).
<rdar://problem/14413117>
llvm-svn: 186373
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
properties/ivars. <rdar://problem/6642337>.
llvm-svn: 161534
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
just to account for us emitting notes more consistently.
llvm-svn: 161528
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
to the declaration in this patch. // rdar://10893232
llvm-svn: 157537
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
declarations without a declarator to structs. Add a warning for ignored attributes. Patch by Michael Han.
llvm-svn: 146796
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
whose enum has been made deprecated/unavailable in the warning.
// rdar://10201690
llvm-svn: 145264
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
attributes from the enumeration type.
// rdar://10201690
llvm-svn: 140800
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
initialized via initializer lists. Fixes <rdar://problem/9694686>.
llvm-svn: 134099
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
tweak the documentation for deprecation-with-message. Provide __has_feature
tests for both. rdar://problem/8605692
llvm-svn: 118435
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 117182
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
unknown attributes that we discard. Add a diagnostic group for unknown
attribute warnings to allow turning these off when we don't care. Also
consolidates the tests for this case.
llvm-svn: 107864
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
- This is designed to make it obvious that %clang_cc1 is a "test variable"
which is substituted. It is '%clang_cc1' instead of '%clang -cc1' because it
can be useful to redefine what gets run as 'clang -cc1' (for example, to set
a default target).
llvm-svn: 91446
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
appears in a deprecated context. In the new strategy, we emit the warnings
as usual unless we're currently parsing a declaration, where "declaration" is
restricted to mean a decl group or a few special cases in Objective C. If
we *are* parsing a declaration, we queue up the deprecation warnings until
the declaration has been completely parsed, and then emit them only if the
decl is not deprecated.
We also standardize the bookkeeping for deprecation so as to avoid special cases.
llvm-svn: 85998
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
should not warn
llvm-svn: 85073
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
process decl attributes instead of dropping them on the floor.
This allows us to diagnose cases like the testcase. Also don't
diagnose deprecated stuff in ActOnTag: not all uses of tags
may be 'uses', and SemaType does this now.
llvm-svn: 85071
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 81346
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Tests and drivers updated, still need to shuffle dirs.
llvm-svn: 67602
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
We now pass all the deprecation tests in the objc.dg suite.
llvm-svn: 64679
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 64637
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 64634
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 64572
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 64549
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 64447
|
|
|
llvm-svn: 52770
|
