| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Mention the deployment target, and don't say "partial" which doesn't
really mean anything to users.
rdar://problem/33601513
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56523
llvm-svn: 351108
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Recommit of r335084 after revert in r335516.
... instead of prepending it at the beginning (the original behavior
since implemented in r122535 2010-12-23). This builds up an
AttributeList in the the order in which the attributes appear in the
source.
The reverse order caused nodes for attributes in the AST (e.g. LoopHint)
to be in the reverse order, and therefore printed in the wrong order in
-ast-dump. Some TODO comments mention this. The order was explicitly
reversed for enable_if attribute overload resolution and name mangling,
which is not necessary anymore with this patch.
The change unfortunately has some secondary effect, especially on
diagnostic output. In the simplest cases, the CHECK lines or expected
diagnostic were changed to the the new output. If the kind of
error/warning changed, the attributes' order was changed instead.
This unfortunately causes some 'previous occurrence here' hints to be
textually after the main marker. This typically happens when attributes
are merged, but are incompatible to each other. Interchanging the role
of the the main and note SourceLocation will also cause the case where
two different declaration's attributes (in contrast to multiple
attributes of the same declaration) are merged to be reverse. There is
no easy fix because sometimes previous attributes are merged into a new
declaration's attribute list, sometimes new attributes are added to a
previous declaration's attribute list. Since 'previous occurrence here'
pointing to locations after the main marker is not rare, I left the
markers as-is; it is only relevant when the attributes are declared in
the same declaration anyway.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48100
llvm-svn: 338800
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This reverts commit r335084 as requested by David Jones and
Eric Christopher because of differences of emitted warnings.
llvm-svn: 335516
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
... instead of prepending it at the beginning (the original behavior
since implemented in r122535 2010-12-23). This builds up an
AttributeList in the the order in which the attributes appear in the
source.
The reverse order caused nodes for attributes in the AST (e.g. LoopHint)
to be in the reverse, and therefore printed in the wrong order by
-ast-dump. Some TODO comments mention this. The order was explicitly
reversed for enable_if attribute overload resolution and name mangling,
which is not necessary anymore with this patch.
The change unfortunately has some secondary effects, especially for
diagnostic output. In the simplest cases, the CHECK lines or expected
diagnostic were changed to the the new output. If the kind of
error/warning changed, the attribute's order was changed instead.
It also causes some 'previous occurrence here' hints to be textually
after the main marker. This typically happens when attributes are
merged, but are incompatible. Interchanging the role of the the main
and note SourceLocation will also cause the case where two different
declaration's attributes (in contrast to multiple attributes of the
same declaration) are merged to be reversed. There is no easy fix
because sometimes previous attributes are merged into a new
declaration's attribute list, sometimes new attributes are added to a
previous declaration's attribute list. Since 'previous occurrence here'
pointing to locations after the main marker is not rare, I left the
markers as-is; it is only relevant when the attributes are declared in
the same declaration anyway, which often is on the same line.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48100
llvm-svn: 335084
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33816
llvm-svn: 307175
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch adds a fix-it for the -Wunguarded-availability warning. This fix-it
is similar to the Swift one: it suggests that you wrap the statement in an
`if (@available)` check. The produced fixits are indented (just like the Swift
ones) to make them look nice in Xcode's fix-it preview.
rdar://31680358
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32424
llvm-svn: 302253
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
rdar://31707804
llvm-svn: 300826
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This commit adds a traversal of the AST after Sema of a function that diagnoses
unguarded references to declarations that are partially available (based on
availability attributes). This traversal is only done when we would otherwise
emit -Wpartial-availability.
This commit is part of a feature I proposed here:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2016-July/049851.html
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23003
llvm-svn: 278826
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We continue accepting "macosx" but canonicalize it to "macos", When emitting
diagnostics, we use "macOS" instead of "OS X".
The PlatformName in TargetInfo is changed from "macosx" to "macos" so we can
directly compare the Platform in AvailabilityAttr with the PlatformName
in TargetInfo.
rdar://26795172
rdar://26800775
llvm-svn: 274064
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
unavailable.
This probably won't come up much, but it seems tidier.
Related to rdar://problem/20713550
llvm-svn: 236242
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
is parsed.
That way we can take any trailing availability attributes into account.
rdar://problem/20713550
llvm-svn: 236241
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This warns when using decls that are not available on all deployment targets.
For example, a call to
- (void)ppartialMethod __attribute__((availability(macosx,introduced=10.8)));
will warn if -mmacosx-version-min is set to less than 10.8.
To silence the warning, one has to explicitly redeclare the method like so:
@interface Whatever(MountainLionAPI)
- (void)ppartialMethod;
@end
This way, one cannot accidentally call a function that isn't available
everywhere. Having to add the redeclaration will hopefully remind the user
to add an explicit respondsToSelector: call as well.
Some projects build against old SDKs to get this effect, but building against
old SDKs suppresses some bug fixes -- see http://crbug.com/463171 for examples.
The hope is that SDK headers are annotated well enough with availability
attributes that new SDK + this warning offers the same amount of protection
as using an old SDK.
llvm-svn: 232750
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
'deprecated'.
Fixes <rdar://problem/15584219> and <rdar://problem/12241361>.
This change looks large, but all it does is reuse and consolidate
the delayed diagnostic logic for deprecation warnings with unavailability
warnings. By doing so, it showed various inconsistencies between the
diagnostics, which were close, but not consistent. It also revealed
some missing "note:"'s in the deprecated diagnostics that were showing
up in the unavailable diagnostics, etc.
This change also changes the wording of the core deprecation diagnostics.
Instead of saying "function has been explicitly marked deprecated"
we now saw "'X' has been been explicitly marked deprecated". It
turns out providing a bit more context is useful, and often we
got the actual term wrong or it was not very precise
(e.g., "function" instead of "destructor"). By just saying the name
of the thing that is deprecated/deleted/unavailable we define
this issue away. This diagnostic can likely be further wordsmithed
to be shorter.
llvm-svn: 197627
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
messages in the parser.
llvm-svn: 190706
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Found by inspection.
llvm-svn: 190701
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 171906
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 171899
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The availability implies default visibility, so it can change the computed
visibility.
llvm-svn: 171840
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
care of comments by Dimitri and Doug.
llvm-svn: 164957
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This tests for the ability to include a "message" field in availability
attributes, like so:
extern void ATSFontGetName(const char *oName)
__attribute__((availability(macosx,introduced=8.0,deprecated=9.0,
message="use CTFontCopyFullName")));
This was actually supported in Clang 3.1, but we got a request for a
__has_feature so that header files can use this more safely. It's
unfortunate that the 3.1 release doesn't include this, however.
<rdar://problem/11886458>
llvm-svn: 160699
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
match gcc behavior for two conflicting visibilities in the same decl. It also
makes handling of dllimport/dllexport more natural.
As a bonus we now warn on the dllimport in
void __attribute__((dllimport)) foo13();
void __attribute__((dllexport)) foo13();
as does gcc.
llvm-svn: 156343
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
for having a uniform logic for adding attributes to a decl. This in turn
is needed to fix the FIXME:
// FIXME: This needs to happen before we merge declarations. Then,
// let attribute merging cope with attribute conflicts.
ProcessDeclAttributes(S, NewFD, D,
/*NonInheritable=*/false, /*Inheritable=*/true);
The idea is that mergeAvailabilityAttr will become a method. Once attributes
are processed before merging, it will be called from handleAvailabilityAttr to
handle multiple attributes in one decl:
void f(int) __attribute__((availability(ios,deprecated=3.0),
availability(ios,introduced=2.0)));
and from SemaDecl.cpp to handle multiple decls:
void f(int) __attribute__((availability(ios,deprecated=3.0)));
void f(int) __attribute__((availability(ios,introduced=2.0)));
As a bonus, use the new structure to diagnose incompatible availability
attributes added to different decls (see included testcases).
llvm-svn: 156269
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
location. // rdar://10893232
llvm-svn: 155385
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
its line. // rdar://10711037
llvm-svn: 148747
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
for now.
llvm-svn: 146321
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
// rdar://10095131
llvm-svn: 146304
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
in the same version that it is introduced. Stuff happens.
llvm-svn: 137214
|
|
|
which versions of an OS provide a certain facility. For example,
void foo()
__attribute__((availability(macosx,introduced=10.2,deprecated=10.4,obsoleted=10.6)));
says that the function "foo" was introduced in 10.2, deprecated in
10.4, and completely obsoleted in 10.6. This attribute ties in with
the deployment targets (e.g., -mmacosx-version-min=10.1 specifies that
we want to deploy back to Mac OS X 10.1). There are several concrete
behaviors that this attribute enables, as illustrated with the
function foo() above:
- If we choose a deployment target >= Mac OS X 10.4, uses of "foo"
will result in a deprecation warning, as if we had placed
attribute((deprecated)) on it (but with a better diagnostic)
- If we choose a deployment target >= Mac OS X 10.6, uses of "foo"
will result in an "unavailable" warning (in C)/error (in C++), as
if we had placed attribute((unavailable)) on it
- If we choose a deployment target prior to 10.2, foo() is
weak-imported (if it is a kind of entity that can be weak
imported), as if we had placed the weak_import attribute on it.
Naturally, there can be multiple availability attributes on a
declaration, for different platforms; only the current platform
matters when checking availability attributes.
The only platforms this attribute currently works for are "ios" and
"macosx", since we already have -mxxxx-version-min flags for them and we
have experience there with macro tricks translating down to the
deprecated/unavailable/weak_import attributes. The end goal is to open
this up to other platforms, and even extension to other "platforms"
that are really libraries (say, through a #pragma clang
define_system), but that hasn't yet been designed and we may want to
shake out more issues with this narrower problem first.
Addresses <rdar://problem/6690412>.
As a drive-by bug-fix, if an entity is both deprecated and
unavailable, we only emit the "unavailable" diagnostic.
llvm-svn: 128127
|
