| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
There is a bot which doesn't use '%1' as the IR name of the first
argument to a function:
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-with-thin-lto-ubuntu/builds/2050/steps/test-stage1-compiler/logs/stdio
llvm-svn: 296248
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
2nd attempt: the first was in r296231, but it had a use after lifetime
bug.
Clang has logic to lower certain conditional expressions directly into llvm
select instructions. However, it does not emit the correct profile counter
increment as it does this: it emits an unconditional increment of the counter
for the 'then branch', even if the value selected is from the 'else branch'
(this is PR32019).
That means, given the following snippet, we would report that "0" is selected
twice, and that "1" is never selected:
int f1(int x) {
return x ? 0 : 1;
^2 ^0
}
f1(0);
f1(1);
Fix the problem by using the instrprof_increment_step intrinsic to do the
proper increment.
llvm-svn: 296245
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
(PR32019)"
This reverts commit r296231. It causes an assertion failure on 32-bit
machines
clang: /export/users/atombot/llvm/clang-atom-d525-fedora-rel/llvm/lib/IR/Instructions.cpp:263: void llvm::CallInst::init(llvm::FunctionType*, llvm::Value*, llvm::ArrayRef<llvm::Value*>, llvm::ArrayRef<llvm::OperandBundleDefT<llvm::Value*> >, const llvm::Twine&): Assertion `(i >= FTy->getNumParams() || FTy->getParamType(i) == Args[i]->getType()) && "Calling a function with a bad signature!"' failed.
llvm::sys::PrintStackTrace(llvm::raw_ostream&) (/export/users/atombot/llvm/clang-atom-d525-fedora-rel/stage1/./bin/clang+0x1c5fbfa)
llvm::sys::RunSignalHandlers() (/export/users/atombot/llvm/clang-atom-d525-fedora-rel/stage1/./bin/clang+0x1c5dc7e)
SignalHandler(int) (/export/users/atombot/llvm/clang-atom-d525-fedora-rel/stage1/./bin/clang+0x1c5dde2)
__restore_rt (/lib64/libpthread.so.0+0x3f1d00efa0)
__GI_raise /home/glibctest/rpmbuild/BUILD/glibc-2.17-c758a686/signal/../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c:56:0
__GI_abort /home/glibctest/rpmbuild/BUILD/glibc-2.17-c758a686/stdlib/abort.c:92:0
__assert_fail_base /home/glibctest/rpmbuild/BUILD/glibc-2.17-c758a686/assert/assert.c:92:0
(/lib64/libc.so.6+0x3f1c82e622)
llvm::CallInst::init(llvm::FunctionType*, llvm::Value*, llvm::ArrayRef<llvm::Value*>, llvm::ArrayRef<llvm::OperandBundleDefT<llvm::Value*> >, llvm::Twine const&) (/export/users/atombot/llvm/clang-atom-d525-fedora-rel/stage1/./bin/clang+0x1804e3a)
clang::CodeGen::CodeGenPGO::emitCounterIncrement(clang::CodeGen::CGBuilderTy&, clang::Stmt const*, llvm::Value*) (/export/users/atombot/llvm/clang-atom-d525-fedora-rel/stage1/./bin/clang+0x1ec7891)
llvm-svn: 296234
|
|
|
Clang has logic to lower certain conditional expressions directly into
llvm select instructions. However, it does not emit the correct profile
counter increment as it does this: it emits an unconditional increment
of the counter for the 'then branch', even if the value selected is from
the 'else branch' (this is PR32019).
That means, given the following snippet, we would report that "0" is
selected twice, and that "1" is never selected:
int f1(int x) {
return x ? 0 : 1;
^2 ^0
}
f1(0);
f1(1);
Fix the problem by using the instrprof_increment_step intrinsic to do
the proper increment.
llvm-svn: 296231
|
