Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
* | [Parser] Emit descriptive diagnostic for misplaced pragma | Serge Pavlov | 2019-08-04 | 1 | -0/+13 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | If a class or struct or union declaration contains a pragma that is not valid in this context, compiler issues generic error like "expected member name or ';' after declaration specifiers". With this change the error tells that this pragma cannot appear in this declaration. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64932 llvm-svn: 367779 | ||||
* | Fix bogus diagnostic wording. There's no such thing as a compound expression. | Richard Smith | 2013-11-15 | 1 | -1/+1 |
| | | | | llvm-svn: 194849 | ||||
* | Test case for r167363. | Lang Hames | 2012-11-04 | 1 | -0/+5 |
| | | | | llvm-svn: 167369 | ||||
* | Fix typo, make test case slightly more reabable. Thanks to Dmitri Gribenko for | Lang Hames | 2012-10-21 | 1 | -1/+2 |
| | | | | | | the suggestions. llvm-svn: 166400 | ||||
* | When used in a compound expression FP_CONTRACT should proceed all explicit | Lang Hames | 2012-10-21 | 1 | -0/+6 |
declarations and statements. Emit an error if the FP_CONTRACT is used later in a compound statement. llvm-svn: 166383 |