| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
template name is not visible to unqualified lookup.
In order to support this without a severe degradation in our ability to
diagnose typos in template names, this change significantly restructures
the way we handle template-id-shaped syntax for which lookup of the
template name finds nothing.
Instead of eagerly diagnosing an undeclared template name, we now form a
placeholder template-name representing a name that is known to not find
any templates. When the parser sees such a name, it attempts to
disambiguate whether we have a less-than comparison or a template-id.
Any diagnostics or typo-correction for the name are delayed until its
point of use.
The upshot should be a small improvement of our diagostic quality
overall: we now take more syntactic context into account when trying to
resolve an undeclared identifier on the left hand side of a '<'. In
fact, this works well enough that the backwards-compatible portion (for
an undeclared identifier rather than a lookup that finds functions but
no function templates) is enabled in all language modes.
llvm-svn: 360308
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
-fms-extensions or -fborland to enable the language extension.
Note: __declspec is also temporarily enabled when compiling for a CUDA target because there are implementation details relying on __declspec(property) support currently. When those details change, __declspec should be disabled for CUDA targets.
llvm-svn: 238238
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
ptr-operators, and use"
This seems to break mixing function-style and c-style casts, and is
breaking bootstrapping llvm.
This reverts r230261.
llvm-svn: 230274
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
the presence of an abstract declarator with a ptr-operator as proof that a
construct cannot parse as an expression to improve diagnostics along error
recovery paths.
llvm-svn: 230261
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 214051
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
fields in the class. This allows a better checking of member intiailizers and
in class initializers in regards to initialization ordering.
For instance, this code will now produce warnings:
class A {
int x;
int y;
A() : x(y) {} // y is initialized after x, warn here
A(int): y(x) {} // default initialization of leaves x uninitialized, warn here
};
Several test cases were updated with -Wno-uninitialized to silence this warning.
llvm-svn: 191068
|
|
|
When a comma occurs in a default argument or default initializer within a
class, disambiguate whether it is part of the initializer or whether it ends
the initializer.
The way this works (which I will be proposing for standardization) is to treat
the comma as ending the default argument or default initializer if the
following token sequence matches the syntactic constraints of a
parameter-declaration-clause or init-declarator-list (respectively).
This is both consistent with the disambiguation rules elsewhere (where entities
are treated as declarations if they can be), and should have no regressions
over our old behavior. I think it might also disambiguate all cases correctly,
but I don't have a proof of that.
There is an annoyance here: because we're performing a tentative parse in a
situation where we may not have seen declarations of all relevant entities (if
the comma is part of the initializer, lookup may find entites declared later in
the class), we need to turn off typo-correction and diagnostics during the
tentative parse, and in the rare case that we decide the comma is part of the
initializer, we need to revert all token annotations we performed while
disambiguating.
Any diagnostics that occur outside of the immediate context of the tentative
parse (for instance, if we trigger the implicit instantiation of a class
template) are *not* suppressed, mirroring the usual rules for a SFINAE context.
llvm-svn: 190639
|
