| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
function
Summary:
For the following code:
```
int i;
#pragma omp taskloop
for (i = 0; i < 100; ++i)
{}
#pragma omp taskloop nogroup
for (i = 0; i < 100; ++i)
{}
```
Clang emits the following LLVM IR:
```
...
call void @__kmpc_taskgroup(%struct.ident_t* @0, i32 %0)
%2 = call i8* @__kmpc_omp_task_alloc(%struct.ident_t* @0, i32 %0, i32 1, i64 80, i64 8, i32 (i32, i8*)* bitcast (i32 (i32, %struct.kmp_task_t_with_privates*)* @.omp_task_entry. to i32 (i32, i8*)*))
...
call void @__kmpc_taskloop(%struct.ident_t* @0, i32 %0, i8* %2, i32 1, i64* %8, i64* %9, i64 %13, i32 0, i32 0, i64 0, i8* null)
call void @__kmpc_end_taskgroup(%struct.ident_t* @0, i32 %0)
...
%15 = call i8* @__kmpc_omp_task_alloc(%struct.ident_t* @0, i32 %0, i32 1, i64 80, i64 8, i32 (i32, i8*)* bitcast (i32 (i32, %struct.kmp_task_t_with_privates.1*)* @.omp_task_entry..2 to i32 (i32, i8*)*))
...
call void @__kmpc_taskloop(%struct.ident_t* @0, i32 %0, i8* %15, i32 1, i64* %21, i64* %22, i64 %26, i32 0, i32 0, i64 0, i8* null)
```
The first set of instructions corresponds to the first taskloop construct. It is important to note that the implicit taskgroup region associated with the taskloop construct has been materialized in our IR: the `__kmpc_taskloop` occurs inside a taskgroup region. Note also that this taskgroup region does not exist in our second taskloop because we are using the `nogroup` clause.
The issue here is the 4th argument of the kmpc_taskloop call, starting from the end, is always a zero. Checking the LLVM OpenMP RT implementation, we see that this argument corresponds to the nogroup parameter:
```
void __kmpc_taskloop(ident_t *loc, int gtid, kmp_task_t *task, int if_val,
kmp_uint64 *lb, kmp_uint64 *ub, kmp_int64 st, int nogroup,
int sched, kmp_uint64 grainsize, void *task_dup);
```
So basically we always tell to the RT to do another taskgroup region. For the first taskloop, this means that we create two taskgroup regions. For the second example, it means that despite the fact we had a nogroup clause we are going to have a taskgroup region, so we unnecessary wait until all descendant tasks have been executed.
Reviewers: ABataev
Reviewed By: ABataev
Subscribers: rogfer01, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53636
llvm-svn: 345180
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
(Step 1).
Summary:
Upstream LLVM is changing the the prototypes of the @llvm.memcpy/memmove/memset
intrinsics. This change updates the Clang tests for this change.
The @llvm.memcpy/memmove/memset intrinsics currently have an explicit argument
which is required to be a constant integer. It represents the alignment of the
dest (and source), and so must be the minimum of the actual alignment of the
two.
This change removes the alignment argument in favour of placing the alignment
attribute on the source and destination pointers of the memory intrinsic call.
For example, code which used to read:
call void @llvm.memcpy.p0i8.p0i8.i32(i8* %dest, i8* %src, i32 100, i32 4, i1 false)
will now read
call void @llvm.memcpy.p0i8.p0i8.i32(i8* align 4 %dest, i8* align 4 %src, i32 100, i1 false)
At this time the source and destination alignments must be the same (Step 1).
Step 2 of the change, to be landed shortly, will relax that contraint and allow
the source and destination to have different alignments.
llvm-svn: 322964
|
