| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We used to advertise private modules to be declared as submodules
(Foo.Private). This has proven to not scale well since private headers
might carry several dependencies, introducing unwanted content into the
main module and often causing dep cycles.
Change the canonical way to name it to Foo_Private, forcing private
modules as top level ones, and provide warnings under -Wprivate-module
to suggest fixes for other private naming. Update documentation to
reflect that.
rdar://problem/31173501
llvm-svn: 321337
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We used to have a flag to enable module maps, and two more flags to enable
implicit module maps. This is all redundant; we don't need any flag for
enabling module maps in the abstract, and we don't usually have -fno- flags for
-cc1. We now have just a single flag, -fimplicit-module-maps, that enables
implicitly searching the file system for module map files and loading them.
The driver interface is unchanged for now. We should probably rename
-fmodule-maps to -fimplicit-module-maps at some point.
llvm-svn: 239789
|
|
|
We were 'allowing' the following import
@import Sub;
where Sub is a subframework of Foo and we had a -F path inside
Foo.framework/Frameworks and no module map file for Sub. This would
later hit assertion failures in debug builds.
Now we should correctly diagnose this as a module not found error.
llvm-svn: 204368
|
