| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We used to advertise private modules to be declared as submodules
(Foo.Private). This has proven to not scale well since private headers
might carry several dependencies, introducing unwanted content into the
main module and often causing dep cycles.
Change the canonical way to name it to Foo_Private, forcing private
modules as top level ones, and provide warnings under -Wprivate-module
to suggest fixes for other private naming. Update documentation to
reflect that.
rdar://problem/31173501
llvm-svn: 321337
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We used to have a flag to enable module maps, and two more flags to enable
implicit module maps. This is all redundant; we don't need any flag for
enabling module maps in the abstract, and we don't usually have -fno- flags for
-cc1. We now have just a single flag, -fimplicit-module-maps, that enables
implicitly searching the file system for module map files and loading them.
The driver interface is unchanged for now. We should probably rename
-fmodule-maps to -fimplicit-module-maps at some point.
llvm-svn: 239789
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This would cause frameworks to have spurious "redefinition" errors if
they had both a (legacy) "module.map" and a (new) "module.modulemap" file and we
happened to do a sub-directory search in that directory using a
non-framework include path (e.g. -Ifoo/ -Ffoo/). For migration
purposes it's very handy that the compiler will prefer the new spelling
of the filename and not look at the old one if it doesn't need to.
llvm-svn: 230308
|
|
|
This name, while more verbose, plays more nicely with tools that use
file extensions to determine file types. The existing spelling
'module.map' will continue to work, but the new spelling will take
precedence.
In frameworks, this new filename will only go in a new 'Modules'
sub-directory.
Similarly, add a module.private.modulemap corresponding to
module_private.map.
llvm-svn: 204261
|
