bcm5719-llvm - Project Ortega BCM5719 LLVM

	Commit message (Collapse)	Author	Age	Files	Lines
*	Add 'not' to commands that are expected to fail.	Rafael Espindola	2013-07-04	1	-5/+5
\| \| \| \| \| \| \|	This is at least good documentation, but also opens the possibility of using pipefail. llvm-svn: 185652
*	Switch to a more natural formatting of the macro name printing.	Chandler Carruth	2011-10-24	1	-2/+2
\| \| \| \| \| \|	Suggested by John McCall. llvm-svn: 142836
*	Now that macro expansion notes are real notes and go through the same	Chandler Carruth	2011-10-16	1	-2/+2
\| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \|	formatting as any other diagnostic, they will be properly line wrapped and otherwise pretty printed. Let's take advantage of that and the new factoring to add some helpful information to them (much like template backtrace notes and other notes): the name of the macro whose expansion is being noted. This makes a world of difference if caret diagnostics are disabled, making the expansion notes actually useful in this case. It also helps ensure that in edge cases the information the user needs is present. Consider: % nl -ba t5.cc 1 #define M(x, y, z) \ 2 y 3 4 M( 5 1, 6 2, 7 3); We now produce: % ./bin/clang -fsyntax-only t5.cc t5.cc:6:3: error: expected unqualified-id 2, ^ t5.cc:2:3: note: expanded from macro: M y ^ 1 error generated. Without the added information in the note, the name of the macro being expanded would never be shown. This also deletes a FIXME to use the diagnostic formatting. It's not yet clear to me that we can do this reasonably, and the production of this message was my primary goal here anyways. I'd love any comments or suggestions on improving these notes, their wording, etc. Currently, I need to make them provide more helpful information in the presence of a token-pasting buffer, and I'm pondering adding something along the lines of "expanded from argument N of macro: ...". llvm-svn: 142127
*	Switch the diagnostic messages about macros to use the terms 'expanded'	Chandler Carruth	2011-07-14	1	-2/+2
\| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \|	and 'expansions' rather than 'instantiated' and 'contexts'. This is the first of several patches migrating Clang's terminology surrounding macros from 'instantiation' to 'expansion'. llvm-svn: 135135
*	Change the include stack of "instantiated from" notes to fall under the ↵	Richard Trieu	2011-05-26	1	-0/+10
\| \| \| \| \| \|	control of f/fno-diagnostics-show-note-include-stack flags. This should help with reducing diagnostic spew from macros instantiations. llvm-svn: 132143
*	Flip the default for showing include stacks on notes to false. This	Chandler Carruth	2011-03-27	1	-0/+18
	required modifying a few tests that specifically use note include stacks to check the source manager's view of include stacks. I've simply added the flag to these tests for now, they may have to be more substantially changed if we decide to remove support for note include stacks altogether. Also, add a test for include stacks on notes that was supposed to go in with the previous commit. llvm-svn: 128390