|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary: I agree with https://easyaspi314.github.io/gcc-vs-clang.html?fbclid=IwAR1VA0qxiWVUusOQUv5z7JESS7ZpeJy-UqAI5mnJscofGLqXcqeErIUB2gU, current warning message is not very good. We should try to improve it..
Reviewers: rsmith, aaron.ballman, easyaspi314
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: arphaman, Quuxplusone, mehdi_amini, hiraditya, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69762
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
We can enable warnings after that -w, so the patch might not be 100%
correct.
The problem that triggered this is: we have some amount of tests that
expect 0 warnings (including unit tests for -w), but -w ends up not fully
silencing everything.
Reviewers: echristo, chandlerc
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11322
llvm-svn: 242606
|