| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
implicitly.
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: arphaman, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53369
llvm-svn: 344889
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
The initial fix (r337453) had bug and was partially reverted (r338255).
This simplies the original fix by explicitly passing the naming class to the
completion consumer.
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52647
llvm-svn: 343575
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Currently, protected members from base classes are marked as
inaccessible when completing in derived class. This patch fixes the problem by
setting the naming class correctly when looking up results in base class
according to [11.2.p5].
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, sammccall, rsmith
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49421
llvm-svn: 337453
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
It will move destructors and operators to the end of completion list.
Destructors and operators are currently very high on the completion
list, as they have the same priority as member functions. However,
they are clearly not something users usually choose in completion
lists.
Reviewers: arphaman, erikjv, bkramer, krasimir
Reviewed By: arphaman
Subscribers: eraman, klimek, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38081
llvm-svn: 314019
|
|
|
available, but not accessible from the current code completion context.
llvm-svn: 141278
|
