| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The tests aren't concerned at all by the actual sanitizer - only by blacklist being reported as a dependency.
We're unfortunately limited by platform support for any particular sanitizer but we can at least use one that is widely supported.
Post-commit review:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D72729
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Checking that the created output matches something is nice, but
this should also check whether the output makes sense.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63979
llvm-svn: 372250
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When using clang as a cross-compiler, we should not use system
headers to do the compilation.
This CL adds support of a new warning flag -Wpoison-system-directories which
emits warnings if --sysroot is set and headers from common host system location
are used.
By default the warning is disabled.
The intention of the warning is to catch bad includes which are usually
generated by third party build system not targeting cross-compilation.
Such cases happen in Chrome OS when someone imports a new package or upgrade
one to a newer version from upstream.
This is reland of r371785 with a fix to test file.
Patch by: denik (Denis Nikitin)
llvm-svn: 371878
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
r371785 is causing fails on clang-hexagon-elf buildbots.
llvm-svn: 371799
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When using clang as a cross-compiler, we should not use system
headers to do the compilation.
This CL adds support of a new warning flag -Wpoison-system-directories which
emits warnings if --sysroot is set and headers from common host system location
are used.
By default the warning is disabled.
The intention of the warning is to catch bad includes which are usually
generated by third party build system not targeting cross-compilation.
Such cases happen in Chrome OS when someone imports a new package or upgrade
one to a newer version from upstream.
Patch by: denik (Denis Nikitin)
llvm-svn: 371785
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 331706
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It's possible for a header to be a symlink to another header. In this
case both will be represented by clang::FileEntry with the same UID and
they'll use the same clang::HeaderFileInfo.
If you include both headers and use some single-inclusion mechanism
like a header guard or #import, one header will get a FileChanged
callback, and another FileSkipped.
So that we get an accurate dependency file, we therefore need to also
implement the FileSkipped callback in dependency scanning.
Patch by Pete Cooper.
Reviewers: bruno, pete
Reviewed By: bruno
Subscribers: cfe-commits, jkorous, vsapsai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30881
llvm-svn: 331319
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
`__has_include_next` requires correct DirectoryLookup for being
evaluated correctly. We were using Preprocessor::GetCurDirLookup() but
we were calling it after the preprocessor finished its work. And in this
case CurDirLookup is always nullptr which makes `__has_include_next`
behave as `__has_include`.
Fix by storing and using CurDirLookup when preprocessor enters a file,
not when we rewrite the includes.
rdar://problem/36305026
Reviewers: bkramer
Reviewed By: bkramer
Subscribers: jkorous-apple, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45603
llvm-svn: 330041
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
1. Require hotness on all remark lines with -verify.
3. Fix the samplePGO file to actually produce hotness on each line.
The second remark has hotness 60 rather 30 which I don't quite understand but
testing this is strictly better than before. It also unblocks the commit of
D40678.
llvm-svn: 319577
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Lifting from Bob Wilson's notes: The hash value that we compute and
store in PGO profile data to detect out-of-date profiles does not
include enough information. This means that many significant changes to
the source will not cause compiler warnings about the profile being out
of date, and worse, we may continue to use the outdated profile data to
make bad optimization decisions. There is some tension here because
some source changes won't affect PGO and we don't want to invalidate the
profile unnecessarily.
This patch adds a new hashing scheme which is more sensitive to loop
nesting, conditions, and out-of-order control flow. Here are examples
which show snippets which get the same hash under the current scheme,
and different hashes under the new scheme:
Loop Nesting Example
--------------------
// Snippet 1
while (foo()) {
while (bar()) {}
}
// Snippet 2
while (foo()) {}
while (bar()) {}
Condition Example
-----------------
// Snippet 1
if (foo())
bar();
baz();
// Snippet 2
if (foo())
bar();
else
baz();
Out-of-order Control Flow Example
---------------------------------
// Snippet 1
while (foo()) {
if (bar()) {}
baz();
}
// Snippet 2
while (foo()) {
if (bar())
continue;
baz();
}
In each of these cases, it's useful to differentiate between the
snippets because swapping their profiles gives bad optimization hints.
The new hashing scheme considers some logical operators in an effort to
detect more changes in conditions. This isn't a perfect scheme. E.g, it
does not produce the same hash for these equivalent snippets:
// Snippet 1
bool c = !a || b;
if (d && e) {}
// Snippet 2
bool f = d && e;
bool c = !a || b;
if (f) {}
This would require an expensive data flow analysis. Short of that, the
new hashing scheme looks reasonably complete, based on a scan over the
statements we place counters on.
Profiles which use the old version of the PGO hash remain valid and can
be used without issue (there are tests in tree which check this).
rdar://17068282
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39446
llvm-svn: 318229
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Un-revert https://reviews.llvm.org/D34868, but with a slight tweak to the
documentation to fix an error -- I had used the wrong syntax for a link.
llvm-svn: 306948
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
The commit caused a documentation breakage.
llvm-svn: 306946
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Depends on https://reviews.llvm.org/D34867.
Add a Clang frontend option to enable optimization remark hotness
thresholds, which were added to LLVM in https://reviews.llvm.org/D34867.
This prevents diagnostics that do not meet a minimum hotness
threshold from being output. When generating optimization remarks for large
codebases with a ton of cold code paths, this option can be used
to limit the optimization remark output at a reasonable size.
Discussion of this change can be read here:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-June/114377.html
Reviewers: anemet, davidxl, hfinkel
Reviewed By: anemet
Subscribers: fhahn, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34868
llvm-svn: 306945
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Prior to this change, using `-fdiagnostics-show-hotness` with a sampling
profile specified via `-fprofile-sample-use=` would result in the Clang
frontend emitting a warning: "argument '-fdiagnostics-show-hotness' requires
profile-guided optimization information". Of course, a sampling profile
*is* profile-guided optimization information, so the warning is misleading.
Furthermore, despite the warning, hotness was displayed based on the data in
the sampling profile.
Prevent the warning from being emitted when a sampling profile is used, and
add a test that verifies this.
Reviewers: anemet, davidxl
Reviewed By: davidxl
Subscribers: danielcdh, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34082
llvm-svn: 306079
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 303642
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This allows #line directives to appear in system headers that have code
that clang would normally warn on. This is compatible with GCC, which is
easy to test by running `gcc -E`.
Fixes PR30752
llvm-svn: 303582
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
after including an empty file with -frewrite-includes.
llvm-svn: 301727
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Original commit message:
Add -fdiagnostics-show-hotness
Summary:
I've recently added the ability for optimization remarks to include the
hotness of the corresponding code region. This uses PGO and allows
filtering of the optimization remarks by relevance. The idea was first
discussed here:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.compilers.llvm.devel/98334
The general goal is to produce a YAML file with the remarks. Then, an
external tool could dynamically filter these by hotness and perhaps by
other things.
That said it makes sense to also expose this at the more basic level
where we just include the hotness info with each optimization remark.
For example, in D22694, the clang flag was pretty useful to measure the
overhead of the additional analyses required to include hotness.
(Without the flag we don't even run the analyses.)
For the record, Hal has already expressed support for the idea of this
patch on IRC.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23284
llvm-svn: 281293
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This reverts commit r281276.
Many bots are failing.
llvm-svn: 281279
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
I've recently added the ability for optimization remarks to include the
hotness of the corresponding code region. This uses PGO and allows
filtering of the optimization remarks by relevance. The idea was first
discussed here:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.compilers.llvm.devel/98334
The general goal is to produce a YAML file with the remarks. Then, an
external tool could dynamically filter these by hotness and perhaps by
other things.
That said it makes sense to also expose this at the more basic level
where we just include the hotness info with each optimization remark.
For example, in D22694, the clang flag was pretty useful to measure the
overhead of the additional analyses required to include hotness.
(Without the flag we don't even run the analyses.)
For the record, Hal has already expressed support for the idea of this
patch on IRC.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23284
llvm-svn: 281276
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
diagnostics
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23816
llvm-svn: 279827
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/llvm-clang-lld-x86_64-scei-ps4-ubuntu-fast/builds/505
http://reviews.llvm.org/D13145
llvm-svn: 248869
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
When using a profile, we used to require the use -gmlt so that we could
get access to the line locations. This is used to match line numbers in
the input profile to the line numbers in the function's IR.
But this is actually not necessary. The driver can provide source
location tracking without the emission of debug information. In these
cases, the annotation 'llvm.dbg.cu' is missing from the IR, but the
actual line location annotations are still present.
This patch tells the driver to only emit source location tracking
when -fprofile-sample-use is present in the command line.
Reviewers: echristo, dblaikie
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5888
llvm-svn: 220383
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
-frewrite-includes. [PR20321]"
We've decided to make the core rewriter class and PP rewriters mandatory.
They're only a few hundred lines of code in total and not worth supporting as a
distinct build configuration, especially since doing so disables key compiler
features.
This reverts commit r213150.
Revert "clang/test: Introduce the feature "rewriter" for --enable-clang-rewriter."
This reverts commit r213148.
Revert "Move clang/test/Frontend/rewrite-*.c to clang/test/Frontend/Rewriter/"
This reverts commit r213146.
llvm-svn: 213159
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 213146
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Enclosing the original #include directive inside #if 0 adds lines,
so warning/errors messages would have the line number off in
"In file included from <file>:<line>:", so add line marker to fix this.
llvm-svn: 207795
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
There's nothing wrong with the change itself, but
test/Frontend/rewrite-includes-messages.c fails without another
not-yet-committed fix.
llvm-svn: 207762
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Enclosing the original #include directive inside #if 0 adds lines,
so warning/errors messages would have the line number off in
"In file included from <file>:<line>:", so add line marker to fix this.
llvm-svn: 207756
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 195877
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
By adding a default config.excludes pattern we can avoid individual
suppressions in subdirectories.
This matches LLVM's lit.cfg which also excludes a few other common non-test
filenames for consistency.
llvm-svn: 194814
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This broke e.g. compiling a crash report from a glibc system on Darwin. Sadly,
the implementation had to game the lexer a lot as we're not using a real
preprocessor here. It also doesn't handle special cases like arbitrary macros in
__has_include, but since this macro isn't common outside of clang's headers we
can get away with that.
Fixes PR14422.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D594
llvm-svn: 179616
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
override whether headers are system headers by checking for prefixes of the
header name specified in the #include directive.
This allows warnings to be disabled for third-party code which is found in
specific subdirectories of include paths.
llvm-svn: 158418
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
only expands #include directives.
Patch contributed by Lubos Lunak (l.lunax@suse.cz).
Review by Matt Beaumont-Gay (matthewbg@google.com).
llvm-svn: 158093
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 142418
|
|
|
- I didn't implement the GCC "multiple include guard" detection parts, because
it doesn't seem useful or obvious.
llvm-svn: 111983
|
