| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
with notail on x86-64.
On x86-64, the epilogue code inserted before the tail jump blocks the
autoreleased return optimization.
rdar://problem/38675807
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59656
llvm-svn: 356705
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
works only on intrinsics
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55802
Reviewers: rjmccall
llvm-svn: 349535
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 299877
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Much to my surprise, '-disable-llvm-optzns' which I thought was the
magical flag I wanted to get at the raw LLVM IR coming out of Clang
deosn't do that. It still runs some passes over the IR. I don't want
that, I really want the *raw* IR coming out of Clang and I strongly
suspect everyone else using it is in the same camp.
There is actually a flag that does what I want that I didn't know about
called '-disable-llvm-passes'. I suspect many others don't know about it
either. It both does what I want and is much simpler.
This removes the confusing version and makes that spelling of the flag
an alias for '-disable-llvm-passes'. I've also moved everything in Clang
to use the 'passes' spelling as it seems both more accurate (*all* LLVM
passes are disabled, not just optimizations) and much easier to remember
and spell correctly.
This is part of simplifying how Clang drives LLVM to make it cleaner to
wire up to the new pass manager.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28047
llvm-svn: 290392
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
receiver extension for message sends via property syntax.
rdar://22172983
llvm-svn: 247209
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This reverts commit r234700. It turns out that the lifetime markers
were not the cause of Chromium failing but a bug which was uncovered by
optimizations exposed by the markers.
llvm-svn: 235553
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
If the revert helps, I'll get a repro this Monday. Else I'll put the change
back in.
llvm-svn: 234700
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Now that TailRecursionElimination has been fixed with r222354, the
threshold on size for lifetime marker insertion can be removed. This
only affects named temporary though, as the patch for unnamed temporaries
is still in progress.
My previous commit (r222993) was not handling debuginfo correctly, but
this could only be seen with some asan tests. Basically, lifetime markers
are just instrumentation for the compiler's usage and should not affect
debug information; however, the cleanup infrastructure was assuming it
contained only destructors, i.e. actual code to be executed, and was
setting the breakpoint for the end of the function to the closing '}', and
not the return statement, in order to show some destructors have been
called when leaving the function. This is wrong when the cleanups are only
lifetime markers, and this is now fixed.
llvm-svn: 234581
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 230795
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 230783
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
pointer migration
llvm-svn: 229271
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Revert r222993 while I investigate some MemorySanitizer failures.
llvm-svn: 222995
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Now that TailRecursionElimination has been fixed with r222354, the
threshold on size for lifetime marker insertion can be removed. This
only affects named temporary though, as the patch for unnamed temporaries
is still in progress.
llvm-svn: 222993
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Simply marking the symbol private conveys the desire to hide them to LLVM.
llvm-svn: 221451
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Revert this patch while I investigate some sanitizer failures off-line.
llvm-svn: 219307
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Boostrapping LLVM+Clang+LLDB without threshold on object size for
lifetime markers insertion has shown there was no significant change
in compile time, so let the stack slot colorizer do its optimization
for all slots.
llvm-svn: 219303
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
of ObjectiveC properties to mean annotation of
NS_RETURNS_INNER_POINTER on its synthesized getter.
This also facilitates more migration to properties when
methods are annotated with NS_RETURNS_INNER_POINTER.
// rdar://14990439
llvm-svn: 191009
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
tests fail.
llvm-svn: 188447
|
|
the requirements on the ARC optimizer.
rdar://13407451
llvm-svn: 176924
|