| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The mangling used to contain the MD5 name of both the RTTI type
descriptor and the name of the copy ctor in MSVC2013, but it changed
to just the former in 2015. It looks like it changed back to the old
mangling in VS2017 version 15.7 and onwards, including VS2019 (version
16.0). VS2017 version 15.0 still has the VS2015 mangling. Versions
between 15.0 and 15.7 are't on godbolt. I found 15.4 (_MSC_VER 1911)
locally and that uses the 15.0 mangling still, but I didn't find 15.5 or
15.6, so I'm not sure where exactly it changed back.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62490
llvm-svn: 361959
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It is not needed after LLVM r327734. Now it will be easier to copy-paste
IR symbol names from Clang.
llvm-svn: 327738
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The tests that failed on a windows host have been fixed.
Original message:
Start setting dso_local for COFF.
With this there are still some GVs where we don't set dso_local
because setGVProperties is never called. I intend to fix that in
followup commits. This is just the bare minimum to teach
shouldAssumeDSOLocal what it should do for COFF.
llvm-svn: 325940
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This reverts commit r325915.
It will take some time to fix the failures on a windows host.
llvm-svn: 325929
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
With this there are still some GVs where we don't set dso_local
because setGVProperties is never called. I intend to fix that in
followup commits. This is just the bare minimum to teach
shouldAssumeDSOLocal what it should do for COFF.
llvm-svn: 325915
|
|
|
Really long symbols are hashed using MD5 and prefixed/suffixed with the
usual sigils. There is an additional reason beyond the usual
compatibility with MSVC, it is important to keep COFF symbols shorter
than 0xFFFF because the CodeView debugging format has a maximum
symbol/record size of 0xFFFF.
There are some quirks worth noting:
- Some mangled names reference other entities which are mangled
separately. A quick example:
int I;
template <int *> struct S {};
S<I> s;
In this case, the mangling for 's' doesn't depend directly on the
mangling for 'I'. While 's' would need an MD5 hash if 'I' also needed
one, the hash for 's' applied to the fully realized mangled name. In
other words, the mangled name for 's' will not depend on the MD5 of the
mangled name for 'I'.
- Some mangled names, like the venerable CatchableType, embed the MD5
verbatim.
- Finally, the complete object locator is handled as a special case.
A complete object locators are mangled exactly like a VFTable except for
a small deviation in the prefix sigils. However, complete object
locators for hashed vftables result in a complete object locator whose
name is identical to the vftable except for an additional suffix.
llvm-svn: 262818
|
