| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The assert added to EmitCall there was triggering in Windows Chromium
builds, due to a mismatch of the return type.
The MSVC constructor call extension (`this->Foo::Foo()`) was emitting
the constructor call from 'EmitCXXMemberOrOperatorMemberCallExpr' via
calling 'EmitCXXMemberOrOperatorCall', instead of
'EmitCXXConstructorCall'. On targets where HasThisReturn is true, that
was failing to set the proper return type in the call info.
Switching to calling EmitCXXConstructorCall also allowed removing some
code e.g. the trivial copy/move support, which is already handled in
EmitCXXConstructorCall.
Ref: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=928861
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57794
llvm-svn: 353246
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This reverts commit https://reviews.llvm.org/rL344150 which causes
MachineOutliner related failures on the ppc64le multistage buildbot.
llvm-svn: 344526
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is currently a clang extension and a resolution
of the defect report in the C++ Standard.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46441
llvm-svn: 344150
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
(Step 1).
Summary:
Upstream LLVM is changing the the prototypes of the @llvm.memcpy/memmove/memset
intrinsics. This change updates the Clang tests for this change.
The @llvm.memcpy/memmove/memset intrinsics currently have an explicit argument
which is required to be a constant integer. It represents the alignment of the
dest (and source), and so must be the minimum of the actual alignment of the
two.
This change removes the alignment argument in favour of placing the alignment
attribute on the source and destination pointers of the memory intrinsic call.
For example, code which used to read:
call void @llvm.memcpy.p0i8.p0i8.i32(i8* %dest, i8* %src, i32 100, i32 4, i1 false)
will now read
call void @llvm.memcpy.p0i8.p0i8.i32(i8* align 4 %dest, i8* align 4 %src, i32 100, i1 false)
At this time the source and destination alignments must be the same (Step 1).
Step 2 of the change, to be landed shortly, will relax that contraint and allow
the source and destination to have different alignments.
llvm-svn: 322964
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This reverts commit r253512.
This likely broke the bots in:
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-ppc64-elf-linux2/builds/20202
http://bb.pgr.jp/builders/clang-3stage-i686-linux/builds/3787
llvm-svn: 253542
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is a follow on from a similar LLVM commit: r253511.
Note, this was reviewed (and more details are in) http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20151109/312083.html
These intrinsics currently have an explicit alignment argument which is
required to be a constant integer. It represents the alignment of the
source and dest, and so must be the minimum of those.
This change allows source and dest to each have their own alignments
by using the alignment attribute on their arguments. The alignment
argument itself is removed.
The only code change to clang is hidden in CGBuilder.h which now passes
both dest and source alignment to IRBuilder, instead of taking the minimum of
dest and source alignments.
Reviewed by Hal Finkel.
llvm-svn: 253512
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Because references must be initialized using some evaluated expression, they
must point to something, and a callee can assume the reference parameter is
dereferenceable. Taking advantage of a new attribute just added to LLVM, mark
them as such.
Because dereferenceability in addrspace(0) implies nonnull in the backend, we
don't need both attributes. However, we need to know the size of the object to
use the dereferenceable attribute, so for incomplete types we still emit only
nonnull.
llvm-svn: 213386
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
type in a function type where the C++ type is a reference. Update the tests.
llvm-svn: 209723
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 197281
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 123742
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 123741
|
|
|
For example:
class A{
public:
A& operator=(const A& that) {
if (this != &that) {
this->A::~A();
this->A::A(that); // <=== explicit constructor call.
}
return *this;
}
};
More work will be needed to support an explicit call to a template constructor.
llvm-svn: 123735
|
