Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
* | Discussing with dgregor we decided that we should not force the emission of | Rafael Espindola | 2010-03-24 | 1 | -33/+0 |
| | | | | | | | | | | implicit methods on explicit template instantiation definitions. As a consequence, we should emit them at every use, even if we see a explicit template instantiation declaration. This is already the current behaviour, but it is good to test for that :-) llvm-svn: 99443 | ||||
* | revert 99311. Looks like it broke darwin bootstrap. | Rafael Espindola | 2010-03-23 | 1 | -34/+2 |
| | | | | llvm-svn: 99317 | ||||
* | Avoid producing implicit methods when we have a explicit template instantiation | Rafael Espindola | 2010-03-23 | 1 | -2/+34 |
| | | | | | | declaration. llvm-svn: 99311 | ||||
* | A fixed version of r99174 which also includes a test that we emit vtables when | Rafael Espindola | 2010-03-22 | 1 | -0/+33 |
we see an specialization definition ever if we then see a extern template declaration. llvm-svn: 99226 |