| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Reapply r374240 with fix for Ocaml test, namely Bindings/OCaml/core.ml.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61675
llvm-svn: 374782
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This reverts commit r374240. It broke OCaml tests:
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-x86_64-debian-fast/builds/19014
llvm-svn: 374354
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Also update Clang to call Builder.CreateFNeg(...) for UnaryMinus.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61675
llvm-svn: 374240
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Reverse the canonicalization of fneg relative to fmul/fdiv. That makes it
easier to implement the transforms (and possibly other fneg transforms) in
1 place because we can always start the pattern match from fneg (either the
legacy binop or the new unop).
There's a secondary practical benefit seen in PR21914 and PR42681:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21914
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42681
...hoisting fneg rather than sinking seems to play nicer with LICM in IR
(although this change may expose analysis holes in the other direction).
1. The instcombine test changes show the expected neutral IR diffs from
reversing the order.
2. The reassociation tests show that we were missing an optimization
opportunity to fold away fneg-of-fneg. My reading of IEEE-754 says
that all of these transforms are allowed (regardless of binop/unop
fneg version) because:
"For all other operations [besides copy/abs/negate/copysign], this
standard does not specify the sign bit of a NaN result."
In all of these transforms, we always have some other binop
(fadd/fsub/fmul/fdiv), so we are free to flip the sign bit of a
potential intermediate NaN operand.
(If that interpretation is wrong, then we must already have a bug in
the existing transforms?)
3. The clang tests shouldn't exist as-is, but that's effectively a
revert of rL367149 (the test broke with an extension of the
pre-existing fneg canonicalization in rL367146).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65399
llvm-svn: 367447
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
This should be fixed properly to not depend on LLVM (so much).
llvm-svn: 367149
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Tests that use -O1, -O2 and -O3 would often produce different results
with the new pass manager which makes these tests fail. Disable new PM
explicitly for these tests.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58375
llvm-svn: 362580
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This test wasn't running due to a missing : after the RUN statement.
Enabling this test revealed that it's actually broken.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58429
llvm-svn: 354481
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary: Plant an inline version of "((ac+bd)/(cc+dd)) + i((bc-ad)/(cc+dd))" instead.
Patch by Paul Walker.
Reviewed By: hfinkel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40299
llvm-svn: 321183
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Re-commit r309257 with less precise register checks in arm-float-helpers.c
test.
llvm-svn: 309263
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The test arm-float-helpers.c appears to be failing on some builders and
needs some work to make it more robust.
llvm-svn: 309259
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The ARM Runtime ABI document (IHI0043) defines the AEABI floating point
helper functions in 4.1.2 The floating-point helper functions. These
functions always use the base PCS (soft-fp). However helper functions
defined outside of this document such as the complex-number multiply and
divide helpers are not covered by this requirement and should use
hard-float PCS if the target is hard-float as both compiler-rt and libgcc
for a hard-float sysroot implement these functions with a hard-float PCS.
All of the floating point helper functions that are explicitly soft float
are expanded in the llvm ARM backend. This change makes clang not force the
BuiltinCC to AAPCS for AAPCS_VFP. With this change the ARM compiler-rt
tests involving _Complex pass with both hard-fp and soft-fp targets.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35538
llvm-svn: 309257
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 251710
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
ARM ABI specifies that all the libcalls use soft FP ABI
(even hard FP binaries). These days clang emits _mulsc3 / _muldc3
calls with default (C) calling convention which would be translated
into AAPCS_VFP LLVM calling and thus the result of complex
multiplication will be bogus.
Introduce a way for a target to specify explicitly calling
convention for libcalls. Right now this is temporary correctness
fix. Ultimately, we'll end with intrinsic for complex
multiplication and all calling convention decisions for libcalls
will be put into backend.
llvm-svn: 223123
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
a NaN-test prior to the call to the library function.
This should automatically make fastmath (including just non-NaNs) able to avoid
the expensive libcalls and also open the door to more advanced folding in LLVM
based on the rules for complex math.
Two important notes to remember: first is that this isn't yet a proper
limited range mode, it's still just improving the unlimited range mode.
Also, it isn't really perfecet w.r.t. what an unlimited range mode
should be doing because it isn't quite handling the flags produced by
all the operations in the way desirable for that mode, but then neither
is compiler-rt's libcall. When the compiler-rt libcall is improved to
carefully manage flags, the code emitted here should be improved
correspondingly. And it is still a long-term desirable thing to add
a limited range mode to Clang that would be able to use direct math
without library calls here.
Special thanks to Steve Canon for the careful review on this patch and
teaching me about these issues. =D
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5756
llvm-svn: 220167
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 220034
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
and !=) to support mixed complex and real operand types.
This requires removing an assert from SemaChecking, and adding support
both to the constant evaluator and the code generator to synthesize the
imaginary part when needed. This seemed somewhat cleaner than having
just the comparison operators force real-to-complex conversions.
I've added test cases for these operations. I'm really terrified that
there were *no* tests in-tree which exercised this.
This turned up when trying to build R after my change to the complex
type lowering.
llvm-svn: 219570
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
for complex math.
This should fix the windows build bots that started having trouble here
and generally fix complex libcall emission on targets which use sret for
complex data types. It also makes the code a bit simpler (despite
calling into a much more complex bucket of code).
llvm-svn: 219565
|
|
|
operators where one type is a C complex type, and to emit both the
efficient and correct implementation for complex arithmetic according to
C11 Annex G using this extra information.
For both multiply and divide the old code was writing a long-hand
reduced version of the math without any of the special handling of inf
and NaN recommended by the standard here. Instead of putting more
complexity here, this change does what GCC does which is to emit
a libcall for the fully general case.
However, the old code also failed to do the proper minimization of the
set of operations when there was a mixed complex and real operation. In
those cases, C provides a spec for much more minimal operations that are
valid. Clang now emits the exact suggested operations. This change isn't
*just* about performance though, without minimizing these operations, we
again lose the correct handling of infinities and NaNs. It is critical
that this happen in the frontend based on assymetric type operands to
complex math operations.
The performance implications of this change aren't trivial either. I've
run a set of benchmarks in Eigen, an open source mathematics library
that makes heavy use of complex. While a few have slowed down due to the
libcall being introduce, most sped up and some by a huge amount: up to
100% and 140%.
In order to make all of this work, also match the algorithm in the
constant evaluator to the one in the runtime library. Currently it is
a broken port of the simplifications from C's Annex G to the long-hand
formulation of the algorithm.
Splitting this patch up is very hard because none of this works without
the AST change to preserve non-complex operands. Sorry for the enormous
change.
Follow-up changes will include support for sinking the libcalls onto
cold paths in common cases and fastmath improvements to allow more
aggressive backend folding.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5698
llvm-svn: 219557
|
