| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
pass at the O1 described there.""
This reapplies: 8ff85ed905a7306977d07a5cd67ab4d5a56fafb4
Original commit message:
As a follow-up to my initial mail to llvm-dev here's a first pass at the O1 described there.
This change doesn't include any change to move from selection dag to fast isel
and that will come with other numbers that should help inform that decision.
There also haven't been any real debuggability studies with this pipeline yet,
this is just the initial start done so that people could see it and we could start
tweaking after.
Test updates: Outside of the newpm tests most of the updates are coming from either
optimization passes not run anymore (and without a compelling argument at the moment)
that were largely used for canonicalization in clang.
Original post:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-April/131494.html
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65410
This reverts commit c9ddb02659e3ece7a0d9d6b4dac7ceea4ae46e6d.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
the O1 described there."
This reverts commit 8ff85ed905a7306977d07a5cd67ab4d5a56fafb4.
This commit introduced 9 new failures on lldb buildbot host at http://lab.llvm.org:8014/builders/lldb-aarch64-ubuntu
Following tests were failing:
lldb-api :: functionalities/tail_call_frames/ambiguous_tail_call_seq1/TestAmbiguousTailCallSeq1.py
lldb-api :: functionalities/tail_call_frames/ambiguous_tail_call_seq2/TestAmbiguousTailCallSeq2.py
lldb-api :: functionalities/tail_call_frames/disambiguate_call_site/TestDisambiguateCallSite.py
lldb-api :: functionalities/tail_call_frames/disambiguate_paths_to_common_sink/TestDisambiguatePathsToCommonSink.py
lldb-api :: functionalities/tail_call_frames/disambiguate_tail_call_seq/TestDisambiguateTailCallSeq.py
lldb-api :: functionalities/tail_call_frames/inlining_and_tail_calls/TestInliningAndTailCalls.py
lldb-api :: functionalities/tail_call_frames/sbapi_support/TestTailCallFrameSBAPI.py
lldb-api :: functionalities/tail_call_frames/thread_step_out_message/TestArtificialFrameStepOutMessage.py
lldb-api :: functionalities/tail_call_frames/thread_step_out_or_return/TestSteppingOutWithArtificialFrames.py
lldb-api :: functionalities/tail_call_frames/unambiguous_sequence/TestUnambiguousTailCalls.py
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65410
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
described there.
This change doesn't include any change to move from selection dag to fast isel
and that will come with other numbers that should help inform that decision.
There also haven't been any real debuggability studies with this pipeline yet,
this is just the initial start done so that people could see it and we could start
tweaking after.
Test updates: Outside of the newpm tests most of the updates are coming from either
optimization passes not run anymore (and without a compelling argument at the moment)
that were largely used for canonicalization in clang.
Original post:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-April/131494.html
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65410
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Don't test the optimizer as part of front-end verification.
llvm-svn: 301928
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In r244063, I had caused these builtins to call the same-named library
functions, __atomic_*_fetch_SIZE. However, this was incorrect: while
those functions are in fact supported by GCC's libatomic, they're not
documented by the spec (and gcc doesn't ever call them).
Instead, you're /supposed/ to call the __atomic_fetch_* builtins and
then redo the operation inline to return the final value.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14385
llvm-svn: 252920
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Support for emitting libcalls for __atomic_fetch_nand and
__atomic_{add,sub,and,or,xor,nand}_fetch was missing; add it, and some
test cases.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10847
llvm-svn: 244063
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
We did a great job getting this wrong:
- We messed up which LLVM IR types to use for arguments and return values.
The optimized libcalls use integer types for values.
Clang attempted to use the IR type which corresponds to the value
passed in instead of using an appropriately sized integer type. This
would result in violations of the ABI for, as an example, floating
point types.
- We didn't bother recording the result of the atomic libcall in the
destination memory.
Instead, call the functions with arguments matching the type of the
libcall prototype's parameters.
This fixes PR20780.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5098
llvm-svn: 216714
|
|
This commit fixes a cast instruction assertion failure
due to the incompatible type cast. This will only happen when
the target requires atomic libcalls.
llvm-svn: 204834
|