| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
copy-initialization. We previously got this wrong in a couple of ways:
- we only looked for copy / move constructors and constructor templates for
this copy, and thus would fail to copy in cases where doing so should use
some other constructor (but see core issue 670),
- we mishandled the special case for disabling user-defined conversions that
blocks infinite recursion through repeated application of a copy constructor
(applying it in slightly too many cases) -- though as far as I can tell,
this does not ever actually affect the result of overload resolution, and
- we misapplied the special-case rules for constructors taking a parameter
whose type is a (reference to) the same class type by incorrectly assuming
that only happens for copy/move constructors (it also happens for
constructors instantiated from templates and those inherited from base
classes).
These changes should only affect strange corner cases (for instance, where the
copy constructor exists but has a non-const-qualified parameter type), so for
the most part it only causes us to produce more 'candidate' notes, but see the
test changes for other cases whose behavior is affected.
llvm-svn: 280776
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
C++ language standard is not C++98.
llvm-svn: 280309
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The reasoning is that this construct is accepted by all compilers and valid in
C++11, so it doesn't seem like a useful warning to have enabled by default.
Building with -pedantic, -Wbind-to-temporary-copy, or -Wc++98-compat still
shows the warning.
The motivation is that I built re2, and this was the only warning that was
emitted during the build. Both changing re2 to fix the warning and detecting
clang and suppressing the warning in re2's build seem inferior than just giving
the compiler a good default for this warning.
Also move the cxx98compat version of this warning to CXX98CompatPedantic, and
update tests accordingly.
llvm-svn: 218008
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
because it expects a reference and receives a non-l-value.
For example, given:
int foo(int &);
template<int x> void b() { foo(x); }
clang will now print "expects an l-value for 1st argument" instead of
"no known conversion from 'int' to 'int &' for 1st argument". The change
in wording (and associated code to detect the case) was prompted by
comment #5 in PR3104, and should be the last bit of work needed for the
bug.
llvm-svn: 158691
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
diagnostic message are compared. If either is a substring of the other, then
no error is given. This gives rise to an unexpected case:
// expect-error{{candidate function has different number of parameters}}
will match the following error messages from Clang:
candidate function has different number of parameters (expected 1 but has 2)
candidate function has different number of parameters
It will also match these other error messages:
candidate function
function has different number of parameters
number of parameters
This patch will change so that the verification string must be a substring of
the diagnostic message before accepting. Also, all the failing tests from this
change have been corrected. Some stats from this cleanup:
87 - removed extra spaces around verification strings
70 - wording updates to diagnostics
40 - extra leading or trailing characters (typos, unmatched parens or quotes)
35 - diagnostic level was included (error:, warning:, or note:)
18 - flag name put in the warning (-Wprotocol)
llvm-svn: 146619
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
direct-initialization (rather than copy-initialization) to initialize
the temporary, allowing explicit constructors. Fixes PR8342.
llvm-svn: 118880
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
constructor into an extension warning into the error that C++98 requires.
llvm-svn: 105529
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
reference binding to an rvalue of reference-compatible type, check
parameters after the first for complete parameter types and build any
required default function arguments. We're effectively simulating the
type-checking for a call without building the call itself.
llvm-svn: 101705
|
|
|
reference-compatible type, the implementation is permitted to make a
copy of the rvalue (or many such copies, even). However, even though
we don't make that copy, we are required to check for the presence of
a suitable copy constructor. With this change, we do.
Note that in C++0x we are not allowed to make these copies, so we test
both dialects separately.
Also note the FIXME in one of the C++03 tests, where we are not
instantiating default function arguments for the copy constructor we
pick (but do not call). The fix is obvious; eliminating the infinite
recursion it causes is not. Will address that next.
llvm-svn: 101704
|
