| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 202925
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
using-declaration, and they declare the same function (either because
the using-declaration is in the same namespace as the declaration it
imports, or because they're both extern "C"), they do not conflict.
llvm-svn: 200897
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The deferred lookup table building step couldn't accurately tell which Decls
should be included in the lookup table, and consequently built different tables
in some cases.
Fix this by removing lazy building of DeclContext name lookup tables. In
practice, the laziness was frequently not worthwhile in C++, because we
performed lookup into most DeclContexts. In C, it had a bit more value,
since there is no qualified lookup.
In the place of lazy lookup table building, we simply don't build lookup tables
for function DeclContexts at all. Such name lookup tables are not useful, since
they don't capture the scoping information required to correctly perform name
lookup in a function scope.
The resulting performance delta is within the noise on my testing, but appears
to be a very slight win for C++ and a very slight loss for C. The C performance
can probably be recovered (if it is a measurable problem) by avoiding building
the lookup table for the translation unit.
llvm-svn: 152608
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
- If the declarator is at the start of a line, and the previous line contained
another declarator and ended with a comma, then that comma was probably a
typo for a semicolon:
int n = 0, m = 1, l = 2, // k = 5;
myImportantFunctionCall(); // oops!
- If removing the parentheses would correctly initialize the object, then
produce a note suggesting that fix.
- Otherwise, if there is a simple initializer we can suggest which performs
value-initialization, then provide a note suggesting a correction to that
initializer.
Sema::Declarator now tracks the location of the comma prior to the declarator in
the declaration, if there is one, to facilitate providing the note. The code to
determine an appropriate initializer from the -Wuninitialized warning has been
factored out to allow use in both that and -Wvexing-parse.
llvm-svn: 148072
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
int f();
in function scopes under -Wvexing-parse, so now we do.
llvm-svn: 147649
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
the Semantic Powers to only warn on class types (or dependent types), where the
constructor or destructor could do something interesting.
llvm-svn: 147642
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
scope, when no other indication is provided that the user intended to declare a
function rather than a variable.
Remove some false positives from the existing 'parentheses disambiguated as a
function' warning by suppressing it when the declaration is marked as 'typedef'
or 'extern'.
Add a new warning group -Wvexing-parse containing both of these warnings.
The new warning is enabled by default; despite a number of false positives (and
one bug) in clang's test-suite, I have only found genuine bugs with it when
running it over a significant quantity of real C++ code.
llvm-svn: 147599
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
- This is designed to make it obvious that %clang_cc1 is a "test variable"
which is substituted. It is '%clang_cc1' instead of '%clang -cc1' because it
can be useful to redefine what gets run as 'clang -cc1' (for example, to set
a default target).
llvm-svn: 91446
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
test case.
Surprisingly, we *do* diagnose one of them. Since we don't really track scopes into
instantiation, this has to signal some kind of bug.
llvm-svn: 91063
|
|
|
declaration. Rename note_using_decl to note_using, which is possibly less confusing.
Add a test for non-class-scope using decl collisions and be sure to note the case
we can't diagnose yet.
llvm-svn: 91057
|
