| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
As suggested in the review for D62949, this patch pre-normalizes the
reference expected output plist files by removing lines containing
fields for which we expect differences that should be ignored.
llvm-svn: 362877
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary: -
Reviewers: NoQ, george.karpenkov
Reviewed By: NoQ
Subscribers: cfe-commits, xazax.hun, baloghadamsoftware, szepet, a.sidorin,
mikhail.ramalho, Szelethus, donat.nagy, dkrupp
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58206
llvm-svn: 362026
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Unfortunately, up until now, the fact that certain checkers depended on one
another was known, but how these actually unfolded was hidden deep within the
implementation. For example, many checkers (like RetainCount, Malloc or CString)
modelled a certain functionality, and exposed certain reportable bug types to
the user. For example, while MallocChecker models many many different types of
memory handling, the actual "unix.MallocChecker" checker the user was exposed to
was merely and option to this modeling part.
Other than this being an ugly mess, this issue made resolving the checker naming
issue almost impossible. (The checker naming issue being that if a checker
registered more than one checker within its registry function, both checker
object recieved the same name) Also, if the user explicitly disabled a checker
that was a dependency of another that _was_ explicitly enabled, it implicitly,
without "telling" the user, reenabled it.
Clearly, changing this to a well structured, declarative form, where the
handling of dependencies are done on a higher level is very much preferred.
This patch, among the detailed things later, makes checkers declare their
dependencies within the TableGen file Checkers.td, and exposes the same
functionality to plugins and statically linked non-generated checkers through
CheckerRegistry::addDependency. CheckerRegistry now resolves these dependencies,
makes sure that checkers are added to CheckerManager in the correct order,
and makes sure that if a dependency is disabled, so will be every checker that
depends on it.
In detail:
* Add a new field to the Checker class in CheckerBase.td called Dependencies,
which is a list of Checkers.
* Move unix checkers before cplusplus, as there is no forward declaration in
tblgen :/
* Add the following new checkers:
- StackAddrEscapeBase
- StackAddrEscapeBase
- CStringModeling
- DynamicMemoryModeling (base of the MallocChecker family)
- IteratorModeling (base of the IteratorChecker family)
- ValistBase
- SecuritySyntaxChecker (base of bcmp, bcopy, etc...)
- NSOrCFErrorDerefChecker (base of NSErrorChecker and CFErrorChecker)
- IvarInvalidationModeling (base of IvarInvalidation checker family)
- RetainCountBase (base of RetainCount and OSObjectRetainCount)
* Clear up and registry functions in MallocChecker, happily remove old FIXMEs.
* Add a new addDependency function to CheckerRegistry.
* Neatly format RUN lines in files I looked at while debugging.
Big thanks to Artem Degrachev for all the guidance through this project!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54438
llvm-svn: 352287
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
..now that it includes OSObjects
rdar://46509986
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56404
llvm-svn: 350869
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
output, update tests""""
This reverts commit 2f5d71d9fa135be86bb299e7d773036e50bf1df6.
Hopefully fixing tests on Windows.
llvm-svn: 341719
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
update tests"""
Reverts analyzer tests from rL341627 again as they still broke windows buildbots
llvm-svn: 341648
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
tests""
This reverts commit a39bcab414dd7ace7e490363ecdf01ecce7743fc.
Reverting the revert, fixing tests.
llvm-svn: 341627
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This reverts commit 03d183b6b94eda27ce66a4f9b87a00b0a148cf9e.
Temporary revert until the tests are fixed.
llvm-svn: 341626
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Split tests which were still using FileCheck to compare plists.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51515
llvm-svn: 341621
|
|
We don't need a new ExpectedOutputs/ convention. Expected outputs are
just another form of test input.
llvm-svn: 339634
|