| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Makes life easier for downstream developers with different default standard.
llvm-svn: 375308
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary: -
Reviewers: NoQ, george.karpenkov
Reviewed By: NoQ
Subscribers: cfe-commits, xazax.hun, baloghadamsoftware, szepet, a.sidorin,
mikhail.ramalho, Szelethus, donat.nagy, dkrupp
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58206
llvm-svn: 362026
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
all dead.
SymbolReaper now realizes that our liveness analysis isn't sharp enough
to discriminate between liveness of, say, variables and their fields.
Surprisingly, this didn't quite work before: having a variable live only
through Environment (eg., calling a C++ method on a local variable
as the last action ever performed on that variable) would not keep the
region value symbol of a field of that variable alive.
It would have been broken in the opposite direction as well, but both
Environment and RegionStore use the scanReachableSymbols mechanism for finding
live symbols regions within their values, and due to that they accidentally
end up marking the whole chain of super-regions as live when at least one
sub-region is known to be live.
It is now a direct responsibility of SymbolReaper to maintain this invariant,
and a unit test was added in order to make sure it stays that way.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56632
rdar://problem/46914108
llvm-svn: 351499
|
|
|
We need to be able to emit the diagnostic at PreImplicitCall,
and the patch implements this functionality.
However, for now the need for emitting such diagnostics is not all that great:
it is only necessary to not crash when emitting a false positive due to an
unrelated issue of having dead symbol collection not working properly.
Coming up with a non-false-positive test seems impossible with the current
set of checkers, though it is likely to be needed for good things as well
in the future.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56042
rdar://problem/46911462
llvm-svn: 350907
|
