| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
So far we used a value of 10 which was useful for testing but produces many false-positives in real programs. The usual suspicious clones we find seem to be at around a complexity value of 70 and for normal clone-reporting everything above 50 seems to be a valid normal clone for users, so let's just go with 50 for now and set this as the new default value.
This patch also explicitly sets the complexity value for the regression tests as they serve more of a regression testing/debugging purpose and shouldn't really be reported by default in real programs. I'll add more tests that reflect actual found bugs that then need to pass with the default setting in the future.
Reviewers: NoQ
Subscribers: cfe-commits, javed.absar, xazax.hun, v.g.vassilev
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34178
llvm-svn: 312468
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
constraint managers
Summary: Replace calls to %clang/%clang_cc1 with %clang_analyze_cc1 when invoking static analyzer, and perform runtime substitution to select the appropriate constraint manager, per D28952.
Reviewers: xazax.hun, NoQ, zaks.anna, dcoughlin
Subscribers: mgorny, rgov, mikhail.ramalho, a.sidorin, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30373
llvm-svn: 296895
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
multiple constraint managers"
This reverts commit ea36f1406e1f36bf456c3f3929839b024128e468.
llvm-svn: 296841
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
constraint managers
Summary: Replace calls to %clang/%clang_cc1 with %clang_analyze_cc1 when invoking static analyzer, and perform runtime substitution to select the appropriate constraint manager, per D28952.
Reviewers: xazax.hun, NoQ, zaks.anna, dcoughlin
Subscribers: mgorny, rgov, mikhail.ramalho, a.sidorin, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30373
llvm-svn: 296837
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
multiple constraint managers"
This reverts commit f93343c099fff646a2314cc7f4925833708298b1.
llvm-svn: 296836
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
constraint managers
Summary: Replace calls to %clang/%clang_cc1 with %clang_analyze_cc1 when invoking static analyzer, and perform runtime substitution to select the appropriate constraint manager, per D28952.
Reviewers: xazax.hun, NoQ, zaks.anna, dcoughlin
Subscribers: mgorny, rgov, mikhail.ramalho, a.sidorin, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30373
llvm-svn: 296835
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
multiple constraint managers"
This reverts commit 1b28d0b10e1c8feccb971abb6ef7a18bee589830.
llvm-svn: 296422
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
constraint managers
Summary: Replace calls to %clang/%clang_cc1 with %clang_analyze_cc1 when invoking static analyzer, and perform runtime substitution to select the appropriate constraint manager, per D28952.
Reviewers: xazax.hun, NoQ, zaks.anna, dcoughlin
Subscribers: mgorny, rgov, mikhail.ramalho, a.sidorin, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30373
llvm-svn: 296414
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
constraint managers"
This reverts commit 8e7780b9e59ddaad1800baf533058d2c064d4787.
llvm-svn: 296317
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
managers
Summary: Replace calls to %clang/%clang_cc1 with %clang_analyze_cc1 when invoking static analyzer, and perform runtime substitution to select the appropriate constraint manager, per D28952.
Reviewers: xazax.hun, NoQ, zaks.anna, dcoughlin
Subscribers: mgorny, rgov, mikhail.ramalho, a.sidorin, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30373
llvm-svn: 296312
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
The parent commit (r283092) was reverted before and now finally landed.
llvm-svn: 283661
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
reverted r283092
This reverts commit r283094.
llvm-svn: 283182
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Highlight code clones referenced by the warning message with the help of
the extra notes feature recently introduced in r283092.
Change warning text to more clang-ish. Remove suggestions from the copy-paste
error checker diagnostics, because currently our suggestions are strictly 50%
wrong (we do not know which of the two code clones contains the error), and
for that reason we should not sound as if we're actually suggesting this.
Hopefully a better solution would bring them back.
Make sure the suspicious clone pair structure always mentions
the correct variable for the second clone.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24916
llvm-svn: 283094
|
|
|
So far macro-generated code was treated by the CloneDetector as normal code.
This caused that some macros where reported as false-positive clones because
large chunks of code coming from otherwise concise macro expansions were treated
as copy-pasted code.
This patch ensures that macros are treated in the same way as literals/function
calls. This prevents macros that expand into multiple statements
from being reported as clones.
Patch by Raphael Isemann!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23316
llvm-svn: 279367
|
