| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Respect C++17 copy elision; previously it would generate destructor calls
for elided temporaries, including in initialization and return statements.
Don't generate duplicate destructor calls for statement expressions.
Fix destructors in initialization lists and comma operators.
Improve printing of implicit destructors.
Patch by Nicholas Allegra!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66404
llvm-svn: 370247
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64526
llvm-svn: 365863
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When searching for construction contexts, i.e. figuring out which statements
define the object that is constructed by each construct-expression, ignore
transparent init-list expressions because they don't add anything to the
context. This allows the Static Analyzer to model construction, destruction,
materialization, lifetime extension correctly in more cases. Also fixes
a crash caused by incorrectly evaluating initial values of variables
initialized with such expressions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59573
llvm-svn: 356634
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The analyzer doesn't make use of them anyway and they seem to have
pretty weird AST from time to time, so let's just skip them for now.
Fixes pr37769.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50824
llvm-svn: 340975
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
CXXTemporaryObjectExpr is a sub-class of CXXConstructExpr. If it has arguments
that are structures passed by value, their respective constructors need to be
handled by providing a ConstructionContext, like for regular function calls and
for regular constructors.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50487
llvm-svn: 339727
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The change in the AST in r338135 caused us to accidentally support
inlining constructors of operator implicit arguments. Previously they were
hard to support because they were treated as arguments in expressions
but not in declarations, but now they can be transparently treated as
simple temporaries.
Add tests and comments to explain how it now works.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49627
llvm-svn: 339087
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In r330377 and r338425 we have already identified what constitutes function
argument constructors and added stubs in order to prevent confusing them
with other temporary object constructors.
Now we implement a ConstructionContext sub-class to carry all the necessary
information about the construction site, namely call expression and argument
index.
On the analyzer side, the patch interacts with the recently implemented
pre-C++17 copy elision support in an interesting manner. If on the CFG side we
didn't find a construction context for the elidable constructor, we build
the CFG as if the elidable constructor is not elided, and the non-elided
constructor within it is a simple temporary. But the same problem may occur
in the analyzer: if the elidable constructor has a construction context but
the analyzer doesn't implement such context yet, the analyzer should also
try to skip copy elision and still inline the non-elided temporary constructor.
This was implemented by adding a "roll back" mechanism: when elision fails,
roll back the changes and proceed as if it's a simple temporary. The approach
is wonky, but i'm fine with that as long as it's merely a defensive mechanism
that should eventually go away once all construction contexts become supported.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48681.
llvm-svn: 338436
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
CFG now correctly identifies construction context for temporaries constructed
for the purpose of passing into a function as an argument.
Such context is still not fully implemented because the information it provides
is not rich enough: it doens't contain information about argument index.
It will be addresssed later.
This patch is an extension of r330377 to C++ construct-expressions and
Objective-C message expressions which aren't call-expressions but require
similar handling. C++ new-expressions with placement arguments still remain to
be handled.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49826
llvm-svn: 338425
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
in some member function calls.
Specifically, when calling a conversion function, we would fail to
create the AST node representing materialization of the class object.
llvm-svn: 338135
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Copy-constructors and move-constructors may have default arguments. It is
incorrect to assert that they only have one argument, i.e. the reference to the
object being copied or moved. Remove the assertion.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49215
llvm-svn: 337229
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When a temporary object is materialized and through that obtain lifetime that
is longer than the duration of the full-expression, it does not require a
temporary object destructor; it will be destroyed in a different manner.
Therefore it's not necessary to include CXXBindTemporaryExpr into the
construction context for such temporary in the CFG only to make clients
throw it away.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47667
llvm-svn: 335798
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Before C++17 copy elision was optional, even if the elidable copy/move
constructor had arbitrary side effects. The elidable constructor is present
in the AST, but marked as elidable.
In these cases CFG now contains additional information that allows its clients
to figure out if a temporary object is only being constructed so that to pass
it to an elidable constructor. If so, it includes a reference to the elidable
constructor's construction context, so that the client could elide the
elidable constructor and construct the object directly at its final destination.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47616
llvm-svn: 335795
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Remove explicit -analyzer-config cfg-temporary-dtors=true in analyzer tests,
since this option defaults to true since r326461.
Reviewers: NoQ
Reviewed By: NoQ
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46393
llvm-svn: 331520
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Loop condition variables, eg.
while (shared_ptr<int> P = getIntPtr()) { ... })
weren't handled in r324794 because they don't go through the common
CFGBuilder::VisitDeclStmt method. Which means that they regressed
after r324800.
Fix the regression by duplicating the necessary construction context scan in
the loop visiting code.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45706
llvm-svn: 330382
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Function argument constructors (that are used for passing objects into functions
by value) are completely unlike temporary object constructors, but we were
treating them as such because they are also wrapped into a CXXBindTemporaryExpr.
This patch adds a partial construction context layer for call argument values,
but doesn't proceed to transform it into an actual construction context yet.
This is tells the clients that we aren't supporting these constructors yet.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45650
llvm-svn: 330377
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Not enough work has been done so far to ensure correctness of construction
contexts in the CFG when C++17 copy elision is in effect, so for now we
should drop construction contexts in the CFG and in the analyzer when
they seem different from what we support anyway.
This includes initializations with conditional operators and return values
across multiple stack frames.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44854
llvm-svn: 328893
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
CXXCtorInitializer-based constructors are also affected by the C++17 mandatory
copy elision, like variable constructors and return value constructors.
Extend r328248 to support those.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44763
llvm-svn: 328255
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In C++17 copy elision is mandatory for variable and return value constructors
(as long as it doesn't involve type conversion) which results in AST that does
not contain elidable constructors in their usual places. In order to provide
construction contexts in this scenario we need to cover more AST patterns.
This patch makes the CFG prepared for these scenarios by:
- Fork VariableConstructionContext and ReturnedValueConstructionContext into
two different sub-classes (each) one of which indicates the C++17 case and
contains a reference to an extra CXXBindTemporaryExpr.
- Allow CFGCXXRecordTypedCall element to accept VariableConstructionContext and
ReturnedValueConstructionContext as its context.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44597
llvm-svn: 328248
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch adds a new CFGStmt sub-class, CFGCXXRecordTypedCall, which replaces
the regular CFGStmt for the respective CallExpr whenever the CFG has additional
information to provide regarding the lifetime of the returned value.
This additional call site information is represented by a ConstructionContext
(which was previously used for CFGConstructor elements) that provides references
to CXXBindTemporaryExpr and MaterializeTemporaryExpr that surround the call.
This corresponds to the common C++ calling convention solution of providing
the target address for constructing the return value as an auxiliary implicit
argument during function call.
One of the use cases for such extra context at the call site would be to perform
any sort of inter-procedural analysis over the CFG that involves functions
returning objects by value. In this case the elidable constructor at the return
site would construct the object explained by the context at the call site, and
its lifetime would also be managed by the caller, not the callee.
The extra context would also be useful for properly handling the return-value
temporary at the call site, even if the callee is not being analyzed
inter-procedurally.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44120
llvm-svn: 327343
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Implicit constructor conversions such as A a = B() are represented by
surrounding the constructor for B() with an ImplicitCastExpr of
CK_ConstructorConversion kind, similarly to how explicit constructor conversions
are surrounded by a CXXFunctionalCastExpr. Support this syntax pattern when
extracting the construction context for the implicit constructor that
performs the conversion.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44051
llvm-svn: 327096
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
For now. We should also add support for ConstructorConversion casts as presented
in the attached test case, but this requires more changes because AST around
them seems different.
The check was originally present but was accidentally lost during r326021.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43840
llvm-svn: 326402
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When a lifetime-extended temporary is on a branch of a conditional operator,
materialization of such temporary occurs after the condition is resolved.
This change allows us to understand, by including the MaterializeTemporaryExpr
in the construction context, the target for temporary materialization in such
cases.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43483
llvm-svn: 326019
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In order to bind a temporary to a const lvalue reference, a no-op cast is added
to make the temporary itself const, and only then the reference is taken
(materialized). Skip the no-op cast when looking for the construction context.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43481
llvm-svn: 326016
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When a constructor of a temporary with a single argument is treated
as a functional cast expression, skip the functional cast expression
and provide the correct construction context for the temporary.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43480
llvm-svn: 326015
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When constructing a temporary that is going to be lifetime-extended through a
MaterializeTemporaryExpr later, CFG elements for the respective constructor
can now be queried to obtain the reference to that MaterializeTemporaryExpr
and therefore gain information about lifetime extension.
This may produce multi-layered construction contexts when information about
both temporary destruction and lifetime extension is available.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43477
llvm-svn: 326014
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Constructors of C++ temporary objects that have destructors now can be queried
to discover that they're indeed constructing temporary objects.
The respective CXXBindTemporaryExpr, which is also repsonsible for destroying
the temporary at the end of full-expression, is now available at the
construction site in the CFG. This is all the context we need to provide for
temporary objects that are not lifetime extended. For lifetime-extended
temporaries, more context is necessary.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43056
llvm-svn: 325210
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When the current function returns a C++ object by value, CFG elements for
constructors that construct the return values can now be queried to discover
that they're indeed participating in construction of the respective return value
at the respective return statement.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42875
llvm-svn: 324952
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Now that we make it possible to query the CFG constructor element to find
information about the construction site, possible cleanup work represented by
ExprWithCleanups should not prevent us from providing this information.
This allows us to have a correct construction context for variables initialized
"by value" via elidable copy-constructors, such as 'i' in
iterator i = vector.begin();
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42719
llvm-svn: 324798
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
CFG elements for constructors of fields and base classes that are being
initialized before the body of the whole-class constructor starts can now be
queried to discover that they're indeed participating in initialization of their
respective fields or bases before the whole-class constructor kicks in.
CFG construction contexts are now capable of representing CXXCtorInitializer
triggers, which aren't considered to be statements in the Clang AST.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42700
llvm-svn: 324796
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Constructors of simple variables now can be queried to discover that they're
constructing into simple variables.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42699
llvm-svn: 324794
|
|
|
This patch adds a new CFGStmt sub-class, CFGConstructor, which replaces
the regular CFGStmt with CXXConstructExpr in it whenever the CFG has additional
information to provide regarding what sort of object is being constructed.
It is useful for figuring out what memory is initialized in client of the
CFG such as the Static Analyzer, which do not operate by recursive AST
traversal, but instead rely on the CFG to provide all the information when they
need it. Otherwise, the statement that triggers the construction and defines
what memory is being initialized would normally occur after the
construct-expression, and the client would need to peek to the next CFG element
or use statement parent map to understand the necessary facts about
the construct-expression.
As a proof of concept, CFGConstructors are added for new-expressions
and the respective test cases are provided to demonstrate how it works.
For now, the only additional data contained in the CFGConstructor element is
the "trigger statement", such as new-expression, which is the parent of the
constructor. It will be significantly expanded in later commits. The additional
data is organized as an auxiliary structure - the "construction context",
which is allocated separately from the CFGElement.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42672
llvm-svn: 324668
|
