summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/clang/test/Analysis/bool-increment.cpp
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* [Analyzer] More accurate modeling about the increment operator of the ↵Henry Wong2018-03-061-0/+84
operand with type bool. Summary: There is a problem with analyzer that a wrong value is given when modeling the increment operator of the operand with type bool. After `rL307604` is applied, a unsigned overflow may occur. Example: ``` void func() { bool b = true; // unsigned overflow occur, 2 -> 0 U1b b++; } ``` The use of an operand of type bool with the ++ operators is deprecated but valid untill C++17. And if the operand of the increment operator is of type bool, it is set to true. This patch includes two parts: - If the operand of the increment operator is of type bool or type _Bool, set to true. - Modify `BasicValueFactory::getTruthValue()`, use `getIntWidth()` instead `getTypeSize()` and use `unsigned` instead `signed`. Reviewers: alexshap, NoQ, dcoughlin, george.karpenkov Reviewed By: NoQ Subscribers: xazax.hun, szepet, a.sidorin, cfe-commits, MTC Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43741 llvm-svn: 326776
OpenPOWER on IntegriCloud