summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/RunLoopAutoreleaseLeakChecker.cpp
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* Fix parameter name comments using clang-tidy. NFC.Rui Ueyama2019-07-161-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This patch applies clang-tidy's bugprone-argument-comment tool to LLVM, clang and lld source trees. Here is how I created this patch: $ git clone https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project.git $ cd llvm-project $ mkdir build $ cd build $ cmake -GNinja -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Debug \ -DLLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS='clang;lld;clang-tools-extra' \ -DCMAKE_EXPORT_COMPILE_COMMANDS=On -DLLVM_ENABLE_LLD=On \ -DCMAKE_C_COMPILER=clang -DCMAKE_CXX_COMPILER=clang++ ../llvm $ ninja $ parallel clang-tidy -checks='-*,bugprone-argument-comment' \ -config='{CheckOptions: [{key: StrictMode, value: 1}]}' -fix \ ::: ../llvm/lib/**/*.{cpp,h} ../clang/lib/**/*.{cpp,h} ../lld/**/*.{cpp,h} llvm-svn: 366177
* [analyzer] Supply all checkers with a shouldRegister functionKristof Umann2019-01-261-0/+4
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Introduce the boolean ento::shouldRegister##CHECKERNAME(const LangOptions &LO) function very similarly to ento::register##CHECKERNAME. This will force every checker to implement this function, but maybe it isn't that bad: I saw a lot of ObjC or C++ specific checkers that should probably not register themselves based on some LangOptions (mine too), but they do anyways. A big benefit of this is that all registry functions now register their checker, once it is called, registration is guaranteed. This patch is a part of a greater effort to reinvent checker registration, more info here: D54438#1315953 Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55424 llvm-svn: 352277
* Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepoChandler Carruth2019-01-191-4/+3
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | to reflect the new license. We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach. Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and repository. llvm-svn: 351636
* [analyzer][NFC] Move CheckerRegistry from the Core directory to FrontendKristof Umann2018-12-151-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ClangCheckerRegistry is a very non-obvious, poorly documented, weird concept. It derives from CheckerRegistry, and is placed in lib/StaticAnalyzer/Frontend, whereas it's base is located in lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core. It was, from what I can imagine, used to circumvent the problem that the registry functions of the checkers are located in the clangStaticAnalyzerCheckers library, but that library depends on clangStaticAnalyzerCore. However, clangStaticAnalyzerFrontend depends on both of those libraries. One can make the observation however, that CheckerRegistry has no place in Core, it isn't used there at all! The only place where it is used is Frontend, which is where it ultimately belongs. This move implies that since include/clang/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/ClangCheckers.h only contained a single function: class CheckerRegistry; void registerBuiltinCheckers(CheckerRegistry &registry); it had to re purposed, as CheckerRegistry is no longer available to clangStaticAnalyzerCheckers. It was renamed to BuiltinCheckerRegistration.h, which actually describes it a lot better -- it does not contain the registration functions for checkers, but only those generated by the tblgen files. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54436 llvm-svn: 349275
* [analyzer] Remove memoization from RunLoopAutoreleaseLeakCheckerGeorge Karpenkov2018-12-111-26/+8
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Memoization dose not seem to be necessary, as other statement visitors run just fine without it, and in fact seems to be causing memory corruptions. Just removing it instead of investigating the root cause. rdar://45945002 Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54921 llvm-svn: 348822
* [analyzer] Bugfix for autorelease + main run loop leak checkerGeorge Karpenkov2018-07-301-4/+9
| | | | | | | | | Do not warn when the other message-send-expression is correctly wrapped in a different autorelease pool. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49921 llvm-svn: 338314
* [analyzer] Fix crash in RunLoopAutoreleaseChecker on empty childrenGeorge Karpenkov2018-07-301-2/+3
| | | | | | Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50012 llvm-svn: 338312
* [analyzer] Syntactic matcher for leaks associated with run loop and ↵George Karpenkov2018-07-251-0/+217
autoreleasepool A checker for detecting leaks resulting from allocating temporary autoreleasing objects before starting the main run loop. Checks for two antipatterns: 1. ObjCMessageExpr followed by [[NARunLoop mainRunLoop] run] in the same autorelease pool. 2. ObjCMessageExpr followed by [[NARunLoop mainRunLoop] run] in no autorelease pool. Happens-before relationship is modeled purely syntactically. rdar://39299145 Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49528 llvm-svn: 337876
OpenPOWER on IntegriCloud