| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
| |
This reverts commit 57cf6ee9c84434161088c39a6f8dd2aae14eb12d.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary: This adds the __riscv_bitmanip macro and the 'b' target feature to enable it.
Reviewers: asb, simoncook, lewis-revill, PaoloS, lenary
Reviewed By: lenary
Subscribers: Jim, rbar, johnrusso, sabuasal, niosHD, kito-cheng, shiva0217, jrtc27, MaskRay, zzheng, edward-jones, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, rkruppe, PkmX, jocewei, psnobl, benna, pzheng, sameer.abuasal, apazos, luismarques, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71553
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Clang/LLVM is a cross-compiler, and so we don't have to make a choice
about `-march`/`-mabi` at build-time, but we may have to compute a
default `-march`/`-mabi` when compiling a program. Until now, each
place that has needed a default `-march` has calculated one itself.
This patch adds a single place where a default `-march` is calculated,
in order to avoid calculating different defaults in different places.
This patch adds a new function `riscv::getRISCVArch` which encapsulates
this logic based on GCC's for computing a default `-march` value
when none is provided. This patch also updates the logic in
`riscv::getRISCVABI` to match the logic in GCC's build system for
computing a default `-mabi`.
This patch also updates anywhere that `-march` is used to now use the
new function which can compute a default. In particular, we now
explicitly pass a `-march` value down to the gnu assembler.
GCC has convoluted logic in its build system to choose a default
`-march`/`-mabi` based on build options, which would be good to match.
This patch is based on the logic in GCC 9.2.0. This commit's logic is
different to GCC's only for baremetal targets, where we default
to rv32imac/ilp32 or rv64imac/lp64 depending on the target triple.
Tests have been updated to match the new logic.
Reviewers: asb, luismarques, rogfer01, kito-cheng, khchen
Reviewed By: asb, luismarques
Subscribers: sameer.abuasal, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, apazos, sabuasal, niosHD, shiva0217, jrtc27, MaskRay, zzheng, edward-jones, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, rkruppe, PkmX, jocewei, psnobl, benna, Jim, s.egerton, pzheng, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69383
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This adds support for reserving GPRs such that the compiler will not
choose a register for register allocation. The implementation follows
the same design as for AArch64; each reserved register becomes a target
feature and used for getting the reserved registers for a given
MachineFunction. The backend checks that it does not need to write to
any reserved register; if it does a relevant error is generated.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67185
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is the logical follow-up of D65634.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66003
llvm-svn: 371496
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When running clang as a native compiler in RISC-V Linux the flag
-mabi=ilp32d / -mabi=lp64d is always mandatory. This change makes it the
default there.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65634
llvm-svn: 371494
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
I plan to reuse it in a later patch.
This is almost NFC except a small change in control flow when diagnosing
+d without +f.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66002
llvm-svn: 371492
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We were calculating twice ilp32/lp64. Do this in one place instead.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48357
llvm-svn: 368128
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
LLVM issues a warning if passed unknown target features. Neither I nor
@asb noticed this until after https://reviews.llvm.org/D63498 landed.
This patch stops passing the (unknown) "save-restore" target feature to
the LLVM backend, but continues to emit a warning if a driver asks for
`-msave-restore`. The default of assuming `-mno-save-restore` (and
emitting no warnings) remains.
Reviewers: asb
Reviewed By: asb
Subscribers: rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, apazos, sabuasal, niosHD, kito-cheng, shiva0217, jrtc27, zzheng, edward-jones, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, rkruppe, PkmX, jocewei, psnobl, benna, Jim, cfe-commits, asb
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64008
llvm-svn: 364777
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
The GCC RISC-V toolchain accepts `-msave-restore` and `-mno-save-restore`
to control whether libcalls are used for saving and restoring the stack within
prologues and epilogues.
Clang currently errors if someone passes -msave-restore or -mno-save-restore.
This means that people need to change build configurations to use clang. This
patch adds these flags, so that clang invocations can now match gcc.
As the RISC-V backend does not currently have a `save-restore` target feature,
we emit a warning if someone requests `-msave-restore`. LLVM does not error if
we pass the (unimplemented) target features `+save-restore` or `-save-restore`.
Reviewers: asb, luismarques
Reviewed By: asb
Subscribers: rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, apazos, sabuasal, niosHD, kito-cheng, shiva0217, jrtc27, zzheng, edward-jones, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, rkruppe, PkmX, jocewei, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63498
llvm-svn: 364018
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 361710
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47127
llvm-svn: 354222
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 353635
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
sed -Ei 's/[[:space:]]+$//' include/**/*.{def,h,td} lib/**/*.{cpp,h}
llvm-svn: 338291
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44888
llvm-svn: 333385
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
std::isdigit can be overloaded, causing the template deduction to fail. Use
Clang's isDigit function which to avoid this. Switch the other calls for
consistency.
llvm-svn: 330887
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 330886
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Supporting additional rules for parsing ISA string.
- RISC-V ISA strings must be lowercase.
E.g.: rv32IMC is not supported, rv32imc is correct.
- Multi-letter extensions are to be separated by a single
underscore '_'. The extension prefix counts as a letter.
This means extensions that start with 's', 'sx' and 'sx'
are all multi-letter.
E.g.:
xasb is a single non-standard extension named 'xasb'
xa_sb are two extensions, the non-standard user level extension
'xa', and the supervisor level extension 'sb'.
- Standard user-level extensions are specified following
a canonical order, according to Table 22.1 in
RISC-V User-Level ISA V2.2.
- Non-standard user-level 'x' extensions,
standard supervisor-level 's' extensions and
non-standard supervisor-level 'sx' extensions
are also specified following a canonical order according
to Table 22.1 in RISC-V User-Level ISA V2.2:
'x' extensions, follwed by 's' extensions and then 'sx' extensions.
- Extensions might have a version number.
Underscores may be used to separate ISA subset components to
improve readability and to provide disambiguation.
E.g.: rv32i2_m3_a1_f2_d2
- Version numbers are divided into major and minor numbers,
separated by a 'p'. If the minor version is 0, then 'p0' can
be omitted.
- Additional checks for dependent extensions and invalid
extensions combinations.
E.g.:
'e' requires rv32
'e' can't be combined with 'f' nor 'd'
'q' requires rv64
- TODO items have also been marked with comments in the code.
Reviewers: asb, kito-cheng
Reviewed By: asb
Subscribers: edward-jones, mgrang, zzheng, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, jordy.potman.lists, sabuasal, niosHD, shiva0217, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45284
llvm-svn: 330880
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This patch doing more check and verify the -march= string and will issue
an error if it's a invalid combination.
Reviewers: asb, apazos
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44189
Patch by Kito Cheng.
llvm-svn: 328690
|
|
As RV64 codegen has not yet been upstreamed into LLVM, we focus on RV32 driver
support (RV64 to follow).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39963
llvm-svn: 322276
|