| Commit message (Expand) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| * | [PCH] When loading fields from external storage make sure to also | Argyrios Kyrtzidis | 2012-09-10 | 1 | -2/+7 |
| * | Switch a couple getAs uses to castAs. | Eli Friedman | 2012-08-30 | 1 | -2/+2 |
| * | Consider the visibility of template template arguments. GCC doesn't, but it also | Rafael Espindola | 2012-07-31 | 1 | -0/+4 |
| * | Fix a typo (the the => the) | Sylvestre Ledru | 2012-07-23 | 1 | -1/+1 |
| * | Move option test earlier in the function. | Rafael Espindola | 2012-07-13 | 1 | -3/+2 |
| * | Use -fvisibility-inlines-hidden in inline functions too. This matches gcc | Rafael Espindola | 2012-07-13 | 1 | -29/+42 |
| * | Fix a bug in my previous commit. The problem is not that we were not using the | Rafael Espindola | 2012-07-13 | 1 | -4/+2 |
| * | Use the canonical template decl when trying to find if it has a visibility | Rafael Espindola | 2012-07-12 | 1 | -2/+4 |
| * | Reintroduced FieldDecl public methods setBitWidth and removeBitWidth. | Abramo Bagnara | 2012-07-02 | 1 | -0/+6 |
| * | We were computing the visibility and linkage of template parameters, but | Rafael Espindola | 2012-06-11 | 1 | -4/+4 |
| * | PR13064: Store whether an in-class initializer uses direct or copy | Richard Smith | 2012-06-10 | 1 | -5/+4 |
| * | PR13051: If a constructor is explicitly defaulted, it isn't marked as being | Richard Smith | 2012-06-08 | 1 | -0/+7 |
| * | Revert Decl's iterators back to pointer value_type rather than reference valu... | David Blaikie | 2012-06-06 | 1 | -2/+2 |
| * | Don't ignore linkage when ignoring visibility in the instantiation of a | Rafael Espindola | 2012-05-25 | 1 | -4/+12 |
| * | Don't ignore linkage when ignoring visibility in the instantiation of a | Rafael Espindola | 2012-05-25 | 1 | -8/+12 |
| * | Consider the linkage for member class templates even when we have to ignore | Rafael Espindola | 2012-05-25 | 1 | -6/+14 |
| * | When ignoring visibility in an instantiation, still consider the linkage. | Rafael Espindola | 2012-05-25 | 1 | -10/+16 |
| * | Whitespace fixes. | Rafael Espindola | 2012-05-25 | 1 | -5/+4 |
| * | Function template version of the previous patch. | Rafael Espindola | 2012-05-21 | 1 | -4/+5 |
| * | Produce a hidden symbol for zed in | Rafael Espindola | 2012-05-21 | 1 | -1/+1 |
| * | Fix the visibility of instantiations of static data members. | Rafael Espindola | 2012-05-16 | 1 | -2/+12 |
| * | Fix our handling of visibility in explicit template instantiations. | Rafael Espindola | 2012-05-15 | 1 | -9/+7 |
| * | Use raw_ostream in TypePrinter and eliminate uses of temporary std::strings. | Argyrios Kyrtzidis | 2012-05-05 | 1 | -3/+1 |
| * | Remove the ref/value inconsistency in filter_decl_iterator. | David Blaikie | 2012-04-30 | 1 | -3/+3 |
| * | Fix visibility when we have two types with explicit visibility in a template | Rafael Espindola | 2012-04-23 | 1 | -3/+3 |
| * | Inline helper function into only caller. | Rafael Espindola | 2012-04-23 | 1 | -1/+1 |
| * | An attribute in a explicit template installation should take precedence over | Rafael Espindola | 2012-04-22 | 1 | -2/+2 |
| * | Fix handling of template parameters. Found by inspection. GCC 4.7 agrees | Rafael Espindola | 2012-04-22 | 1 | -3/+1 |
| * | All the members of LVFlags always have the same value, replace the class with | Rafael Espindola | 2012-04-21 | 1 | -68/+46 |
| * | In mergeVisibility, if we already have an explicit visibility, keep it. | Rafael Espindola | 2012-04-19 | 1 | -7/+11 |
| * | Now that we check visibility attributes in an appropriate order, | Rafael Espindola | 2012-04-19 | 1 | -1/+1 |
| * | Check ConsiderGlobalVisibility before using -fvisibility. | Rafael Espindola | 2012-04-19 | 1 | -2/+4 |
| * | The explicit bit in LV already tracks exactly the same information as | Rafael Espindola | 2012-04-19 | 1 | -6/+2 |
| * | Move the point in the code where we handle -fvisibility=hidden. With | Rafael Espindola | 2012-04-19 | 1 | -2/+4 |
| * | Make setVisibility private and change users to mergeVisibility. This is | Rafael Espindola | 2012-04-19 | 1 | -7/+7 |
| * | Calling setVisibility directly only makes (some) sense when the visibility is | Rafael Espindola | 2012-04-18 | 1 | -3/+3 |
| * | Simplify calls to mergeVisibility* by passing in the LinkageInfo. No | Rafael Espindola | 2012-04-17 | 1 | -3/+2 |
| * | Revert r154749 for now at John McCall's request. | Rafael Espindola | 2012-04-16 | 1 | -19/+19 |
| * | Use ordering and the explicit visibility bit instead of modifying | Rafael Espindola | 2012-04-16 | 1 | -44/+36 |
| * | Add another constructor to LVFlags and use it to simplify the code a bit. | Rafael Espindola | 2012-04-16 | 1 | -18/+10 |
| * | Consider visibility attributes last, so that they take precedence. | Rafael Espindola | 2012-04-14 | 1 | -21/+21 |
| * | When we form a new function/class template specialization, we first | Douglas Gregor | 2012-03-28 | 1 | -16/+1 |
| * | Introduce a new libclang API to determine the parent context of a code | Douglas Gregor | 2012-03-27 | 1 | -1/+1 |
| * | Support for definitions of member enumerations of class templates outside the | Richard Smith | 2012-03-23 | 1 | -0/+18 |
| * | Instantiating a class template should not instantiate the definition of any | Richard Smith | 2012-03-14 | 1 | -0/+13 |
| * | Unify naming of LangOptions variable/get function across the Clang stack (Lex... | David Blaikie | 2012-03-11 | 1 | -22/+22 |
| * | The type of a definition should not increase its visibility. Fixes PR12221. | Rafael Espindola | 2012-03-10 | 1 | -2/+2 |
| * | [AST] Reduce Decl::getASTContext() calls. | Daniel Dunbar | 2012-03-09 | 1 | -8/+10 |
| * | Untangle getUnderlyingDeclImpl, no functionality change. | Benjamin Kramer | 2012-03-08 | 1 | -9/+7 |
| * | [AST] Change NamedDecl::getUnderlyingDecl() to inline the fast (and incredibl... | Daniel Dunbar | 2012-03-08 | 1 | -1/+1 |
