| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
part of check-clang-tools.
Summary:
Motivation:
- this layout is a pain to work with
- without a common root, it's painful to express things like "disable clangd" (D61122)
- CMake/lit configs are a maintenance hazard, and the more the one-off hacks
for various tools are entangled, the more we see apathy and non-ownership.
This attempts to use the bare-minimum configuration needed (while still
supporting the difficult cases: windows, standalone clang build, dynamic libs).
In particular the lit.cfg.py and lit.site.cfg.py.in are merged into lit.cfg.in.
The logic in these files is now minimal.
(Much of clang-tools-extra's lit configs can probably be cleaned up by reusing
lit.llvm.llvm_config.use_clang(), and every llvm project does its own version of
LDPATH mangling. I haven't attempted to fix any of those).
Docs are still in clang-tools-extra/docs, I don't have any plans to touch those.
Reviewers: gribozavr
Subscribers: mgorny, javed.absar, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, jfb, cfe-commits, ilya-biryukov, thakis
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61187
llvm-svn: 359424
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Previously code completion did not work well for Objective-C methods
which contained multiple arguments as clangd did not expect to see
multiple typed-text chunks when handling code completion.
Note that even with this change, we do not consider selector fragments
from previous arguments to be part of the signature (although we
could in the future).
Reviewers: sammccall
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, jfb, kadircet, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53934
llvm-svn: 346836
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Previously, the strings matched LSP completion pretty closely.
The completion label was a single string, for instance. This made
implementing completion itself easy but makes it hard to use the names
in other way, e.g. pretty-printed name in synthesized
documentation/hover.
It also limits our introspection into completion items, which can only
be as precise as the indexed symbols. This change is a prerequisite to
improvements to overload bundling which need to inspect e.g. signature
structure.
Reviewers: ioeric
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48475
llvm-svn: 335360
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
It's almost always identical to Name, and in fact we never used it (we used name
instead).
The only case where they differ is objc method selectors (foo: vs foo:bar:).
We can live with the latter for both name and filterText, so I've made that
change too.
Reviewers: ioeric
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48375
llvm-svn: 335321
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Previous implementation used to extract brief text from doxygen comments.
Brief text parsing slows down completion and is not suited for
non-doxygen comments.
This commit switches to providing comments that mimic the ones
originally written in the source code, doing minimal reindenting and
removing the comments markers to make the output more user-friendly.
It means we lose support for doxygen-specific features, e.g. extracting
brief text, but provide useful results for non-doxygen comments.
Switching the doxygen support back is an option, but I suggest to see
whether the current approach gives more useful results.
Reviewers: sammccall, hokein, ioeric
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: klimek, MaskRay, jkorous, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45999
llvm-svn: 332459
|
|
|
unit test.
Reviewers: sammccall
Subscribers: klimek, mgorny, ilya-biryukov, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41450
llvm-svn: 321193
|
