| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
There is no reason to expect this tool to be limited to C++11, it seems
very likely to be of on-going interest. It seems likely to be useful for
modernizing even as new libraries come out in TSes and other formats
than a complete standard. Fundamentally, we need something a bit more
general. After some discussion on the list, going with
'clang-modernize'.
I've tried to do a reasonably comprehensive job of fixing up the names,
but I may still have missed some. Feel free to poke me if you spot any
fallout here. Things I've tried reasonably hard to find and fix:
- cpp11-migrate -> clang-modernize
- Migrator -> Modernizer
- Clean up the introductory documentation that was C++11 specific.
I'll also point out that this tool continues to delight me. =] Also,
a huge thanks to those who have so carefully, thoroughly documented the
tool. The docs here are simply phenomenal. Every tool should be this
well documented. I hope I have updated the documentation reasonably
well, but I'm not very good at documentation, so review much
appreciated.
llvm-svn: 189960
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
using inline namespaces is specified.
UseAuto used to fail to transform iterators when using inline namespaces and
non-fully qualified types, relying on a using directive previously declared.
- This fix uses the already define isFromStdNamespace matcher.
- Fixed tests and added a new test using inline namespaces.
- Added CustomMatchers to reuse common matchers among transforms.
llvm-svn: 186327
|
|
|
NOTE: You may need to run 'make clean' or 'ninja -t clean' etc!!! This
is due to really nasty bug/interactions between
CMake/configure/make/Ninja/LIT...
This commit tries to back out the support for generating test cases as
part of the build system due to the issues I brought up in post-commit
review:
1) It adds a *lot* of complexity and fragility to the build system. See
the number of commits required to try to get all the bots happy.
2) It isn't really necessary -- we can already run scripts to generate
things with the RUN lines of a test.
3) It makes the tests somewhat harder to debug as they cross between
more domains.
4) In almost all cases it isn't really needed or it can be done directly
using the preprocessor.
I should have been more proactive reviewing this, and I'm really sorry
about the churn here. =/ To help keep track of what commits are going
where, this backs out most of the non-test-changes from these revisions:
r176397
r176373
r176293
r176184
r175744
r175624
r175545
r175544
There were several trivial or cleanup changes to the lit files or other
files. Some of these looked ok, but I didn't try to tease them apart...
Edwin, if you know what to look for, please carry on with the cleanups
there, and sorry for hosing stuff here but I'm not much of a Python
person, and so I was erring on the side of cautiously backing out the
change.
I've tried to preserve the test changes everywhere I could, but review
is appreciated here in case I missed some.
I then re-wrote the tests to use the preprocessor rather than python to
expand to the various bits of code. The nicest part of this is that now
all the files are just C++ code. They edit and behave like C++ code,
etc. RUN lines with different -D flags are used to run the same test
over multiple different configurations, and includes bracketed in
special defines are used to flesh out a collection of standard interface
stubs to test interactions between pieces. These probably aren't perfect
yet, but I think its an improvement (at least in terms of build system
complexity) and will hopefully be a useful demonstration of the
technique I prefer for these types of tests.
llvm-svn: 176627
|
