| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
I don't bother mirroring the full capabilities struct, just parse the
bits we care about. I'll send a new patch to use this approach elsewhere too.
Reviewers: kadircet
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53213
llvm-svn: 344617
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
capability was given by the client
After r339738 Clangd started sending categories with each diagnostic, but that
broke the eglot client. This commit puts the categories behind a capability to
fix that breakage.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51077
llvm-svn: 340449
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch adds a 'category' extension field to the LSP diagnostic that's sent
by Clangd. This extension is always on by default.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50571
llvm-svn: 339738
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The diagnostic messages that are sent to the client from Clangd are now always
capitalized.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50154
llvm-svn: 338919
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
The new implementation attaches notes to diagnostic message and shows
the original diagnostics in the message of the note.
Reviewers: hokein, ioeric, sammccall
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: klimek, mgorny, cfe-commits, jkorous-apple
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44142
llvm-svn: 327282
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Instead of content-length, we delimit messages with ---.
This also removes the need for (most) dos-formatted test files.
Reviewers: ioeric
Subscribers: klimek, ilya-biryukov, jkorous-apple, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42919
llvm-svn: 324333
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
URI failures.
Summary:
This should also fix the current windows buildbot breakage
(http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-x86-windows-msvc2015/builds/9838/steps/ninja%20check%201/logs/stdio)
Reviewers: sammccall
Subscribers: klimek, ilya-biryukov, jkorous-apple, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42735
llvm-svn: 323885
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
- when the diagnostic has an explicit range, we prefer that
- if the diagnostic has a fixit, its RemoveRange is our next choice
- otherwise we try to expand the diagnostic location into a whole token.
(inspired by VSCode, which does this client-side when given an empty range)
- if all else fails, we return the zero-width range as now.
(clients react in different ways to this, highlighting a token or a char)
- this includes the off-by-one fix from D40860, and borrows heavily from it
Reviewers: rwols, hokein
Subscribers: klimek, ilya-biryukov, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41118
llvm-svn: 320555
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This form can be created with a nice clang-format-friendly literal syntax,
and gets escaping right. It knows how to call unparse() on our Protocol types.
All the places where we pass around JSON internally now use this type.
Object properties are sorted (stored as std::map) and so serialization is
canonicalized, with optional prettyprinting (triggered by a -pretty flag).
This makes the lit tests much nicer to read and somewhat nicer to debug.
(Unfortunately the completion tests use CHECK-DAG, which only has
line-granularity, so pretty-printing is disabled there. In future we
could make completion ordering deterministic, or switch to unittests).
Compared to the current approach, it has some efficiencies like avoiding copies
of string literals used as object keys, but is probably slower overall.
I think the code/test quality benefits are worth it.
This patch doesn't attempt to do anything about JSON *parsing*.
It takes direction from the proposal in this doc[1], but is limited in scope
and visibility, for now.
I am of half a mind just to use Expr as the target of a parser, and maybe do a
little string deduplication, but not bother with clever memory allocation.
That would be simple, and fast enough for clangd...
[1] https://docs.google.com/document/d/1OEF9IauWwNuSigZzvvbjc1cVS1uGHRyGTXaoy3DjqM4/edit
+cc d0k so he can tell me not to use std::map.
Reviewers: ioeric, malaperle
Subscribers: bkramer, ilya-biryukov, mgorny, klimek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39435
llvm-svn: 317486
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
When the user selects a fix-it (or any code action with commands), it is
possible to let the client forward the selected command to the server.
When the clangd.applyFix command is handled on the server, it can send a
workspace/applyEdit request to the client. This has the advantage that
the client doesn't explicitly have to know how to handle
clangd.applyFix. Therefore, the code to handle clangd.applyFix in the VS
Code extension (and any other Clangd client) is not required anymore.
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov, sammccall, Nebiroth, hokein
Reviewed By: hokein
Subscribers: ioeric, hokein, rwols, puremourning, bkramer, ilya-biryukov
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39276
llvm-svn: 317322
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This changes the onShutdown handler to do essentially nothing (for now), and
instead exits the runloop when we receive the exit notification from the client.
Some clients may wait on the reply from the shutdown request before sending an
exit notification. If we exit the runloop already in the shutdown request, a
client might block forever.
This also gives us the opportunity to do any global cleanups and/or
serializations of PCH preambles to disk, but I've left that out for now.
See the LSP protocol documentation for details.
Reviewers: malaperle, krasimir, bkramer, sammccall, ilya-biryukov
Reviewed By: malaperle, sammccall, ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38939
llvm-svn: 316564
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Make the ProtocolHandlers glue between JSONRPCDispatcher and
ClangdLSPServer generic.
Eliminate small differences between methods, de-emphasize the unimportant
distinction between notifications and methods.
ClangdLSPServer is no longer responsible for producing a complete
JSON-RPC response, just the JSON of the result object. (In future, we
should move that JSON serialization out, too).
Handler methods now take a context object that we may hang more
functionality off in the future.
Added documentation to ProtocolHandlers.
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov, bkramer
Reviewed By: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38464
llvm-svn: 315577
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Fix for bug https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34559
Also log unknown fields instead of aborting the JSON parsing because it's
common that new optional fields are added either in new versions of the protocol
or extensions.
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov
Reviewed By: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37754
llvm-svn: 313536
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This reverts r299849, apparently these tests only fail on my machine.
llvm-svn: 299850
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
They all assert. Filed as PR32596.
llvm-svn: 299849
|
|
Summary:
This uses CodeActions to show 'apply fix' actions when code actions are
requested for a location. The actions themselves make use of a
clangd.applyFix command which has to be implemented on the editor side. I
included an implementation for vscode.
This also adds a -run-synchronously flag which runs everything on the main
thread. This is useful for testing.
Reviewers: krasimir
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30498
llvm-svn: 296636
|