| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This change moves tests for checkers and infrastructure into separate
directories, making it easier to find infrastructure tests. Tests for
checkers are already easy to find because they are named after the
checker. Tests for infrastructure were difficult to find because they
were outnumbered by tests for checkers. Now they are in a separate
directory.
Reviewers: jfb, jdoerfert, lebedev.ri
Subscribers: srhines, nemanjai, aheejin, kbarton, christof, mgrang, arphaman, jfb, lebedev.ri, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68807
llvm-svn: 374540
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
I inspected every test and did one of the following:
- changed the test to run in all language modes,
- added a comment explaining why the test is only applicable in a
certain mode,
- limited the test to language modes where it passes and added a FIXME
to fix the checker or the test.
Reviewers: alexfh, lebedev.ri
Subscribers: nemanjai, kbarton, arphaman, jdoerfert, lebedev.ri, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62125
llvm-svn: 361131
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary: Use the old index name in the cases where the check would come up with an invented name.
Reviewers: klimek
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14438
llvm-svn: 252308
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
I recently found that the variable naming wasn't working as expected with containers that are data members. The new index always received the name "Elem" (or equivalent) regardless of the container's name.
The check was assuming that the container's declaration was a VarDecl, which cannot be converted to a FieldDecl (a data member), and then it could never retrieve its name.
This also fixes some cases where the check failed to find the container at all (so it didn't do any fix) because of the same reason.
Reviewers: klimek
Subscribers: cfe-commits, alexfh
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14289
llvm-svn: 251943
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary: The previous change was focused in detecting when a non-const object was used in a constant way. Looks like I forgot the most important and trivial case: when the object is already constant. Failing to detect this cases results in compile errors, due to trying to bind a constant object to a non-const reference in the range-for statement. This change should fix that.
Reviewers: klimek
Subscribers: alexfh, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14282
llvm-svn: 251940
|
|
|
Summary:
Now, it detects that several kinds of usages are can't modify the elements. Examples:
-When an usage is a call to a const member function or operator of the element.
-If the element is used as an argument to a function or constructor that takes a const-reference or a value.
-LValue to RValue conversion, if the element is a fundamental type (which allows the use of most of the builtin operators).
Reviewers: klimek
Subscribers: cfe-commits, alexfh
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14198
llvm-svn: 251808
|
