| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This change moves tests for checkers and infrastructure into separate
directories, making it easier to find infrastructure tests. Tests for
checkers are already easy to find because they are named after the
checker. Tests for infrastructure were difficult to find because they
were outnumbered by tests for checkers. Now they are in a separate
directory.
Reviewers: jfb, jdoerfert, lebedev.ri
Subscribers: srhines, nemanjai, aheejin, kbarton, christof, mgrang, arphaman, jfb, lebedev.ri, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68807
llvm-svn: 374540
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 373951
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary: It was trying to pass a dependent expression into constant evaluator.
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63188
llvm-svn: 363133
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
The assertion "isIntegerConstantExpr" is triggered in the
isIntegerConstantExpr(), we should not call it if the expression is value
dependent.
Reviewers: gribozavr
Subscribers: xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62947
llvm-svn: 362701
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
I inspected every test and did one of the following:
- changed the test to run in all language modes,
- added a comment explaining why the test is only applicable in a
certain mode,
- limited the test to language modes where it passes and added a FIXME
to fix the checker or the test.
Reviewers: alexfh, lebedev.ri
Subscribers: nemanjai, kbarton, arphaman, jdoerfert, lebedev.ri, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62125
llvm-svn: 361131
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 323980
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
bitwise operator expressions
Examples:
* Always evaluates to 0:
```
int X;
if (0 & X) return;
```
* Always evaluates to ~0:
```
int Y;
if (Y | ~0) return;
```
* The symbol is unmodified:
```
int Z;
Z &= ~0;
```
Patch by: Lilla Barancsuk!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39285
llvm-svn: 321168
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Patch by: Lilla Barancsuk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39243
llvm-svn: 319033
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Redundant Expression Checker is updated to be able to detect expressions that
contain macros. Also, other small details are modified to improve the current
implementation.
The improvements in detail are as follows:
* Binary and ternary operator expressions containing two constants, with at
least one of them from a macro, are detected and tested for redundancy.
Macro expressions are treated somewhat differently from other expressions,
because the particular values of macros can vary across builds.
They can be considered correct and intentional, even if macro values equal,
produce ranges that exclude each other or fully overlap, etc.
* The code structure is slightly modified: typos are corrected,
comments are added and some functions are renamed to improve comprehensibility,
both in the checker and the test file. A few test cases are moved to another
function.
* The checker is now able to detect redundant CXXFunctionalCastExprs as well.
A corresponding test case is added.
Patch by: Lilla Barancsuk!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38688
llvm-svn: 317570
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Catch trivially true statements of the form a != 1 || a != 3. Statements like
these are likely errors. They are particularly easy to miss when handling enums:
enum State {
RUNNING,
STOPPED,
STARTING,
ENDING
}
...
if (state != RUNNING || state != STARTING)
...
Patch by Blaise Watson!
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29858
llvm-svn: 298607
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 289547
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary: This patch is adding support to recognize more complex redundant expressions.
Reviewers: alexfh
Subscribers: aaron.ballman, cfe-commits, chrisha
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21392
llvm-svn: 274731
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This patch is adding support for conditional expression and overloaded operators.
To decrease false-positive, this patch is adding a list of banned macro names that
has multiple variant with same integer value.
Also fixed support for template instantiation and added an unittest.
Reviewers: alexfh
Subscribers: klimek, Sarcasm, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19703
llvm-svn: 269275
|
|
Summary:
This checker finds redundant expression on both side of a binary operator.
The current implementation provide a function to check whether expressions
are equivalent. This implementation is able to recognize the common
subset encounter in C++ program. Side-effects like "x++" are not considered
to be equivalent.
There are many False Positives related to macros and to floating point
computations (detecting NaN). The checker is ignoring these cases.
Example:
```
if( !dst || dst->depth != desired_depth ||
dst->nChannels != desired_num_channels ||
dst_size.width != src_size.width ||
dst_size.height != dst_size.height ) <<--- bug
{
```
Reviewers: alexfh
Subscribers: danielmarjamaki, fahlgren, jordan_rose, zaks.anna, Eugene.Zelenko, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19451
llvm-svn: 267574
|