| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This change moves tests for checkers and infrastructure into separate
directories, making it easier to find infrastructure tests. Tests for
checkers are already easy to find because they are named after the
checker. Tests for infrastructure were difficult to find because they
were outnumbered by tests for checkers. Now they are in a separate
directory.
Reviewers: jfb, jdoerfert, lebedev.ri
Subscribers: srhines, nemanjai, aheejin, kbarton, christof, mgrang, arphaman, jfb, lebedev.ri, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68807
llvm-svn: 374540
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The original check did break the green buildbot in the sanitizer build.
It took a while to redroduce and understand the issue.
There occured a stackoverflow while parsing the AST. The testcase with
256 case labels was the problem because each case label added another
stackframe. It seemed that the issue occured only in 'RelWithDebInfo' builds
and not in normal sanitizer builds.
To simplify the matchers the recognition for the different kinds of switch
statements has been moved into a seperate function and will not be done with
ASTMatchers. This is an attempt to reduce recursion and stacksize as well.
The new check removed this big testcase. Covering all possible values is still
implemented for bitfields and works there. The same logic on integer types
will lead to the issue.
Running it over LLVM gives the following results:
Differential: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40737
llvm-svn: 328107
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The address sanitizer found a stackoverflow with this patch.
There is no obvious fix. This patch will be reapplied when the problem
is found.
llvm-svn: 318670
|
|
|
Summary:
This check searches for missing `else` branches in `if-else if`-chains and
missing `default` labels in `switch` statements, that use integers as condition.
It is very similar to -Wswitch, but concentrates on integers only, since enums are
already covered.
The option to warn for missing `else` branches is deactivated by default, since it is
very noise on larger code bases.
Running it on LLVM:
{F5354858} for default configuration
{F5354866} just for llvm/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp, the else-path checker is very noisy!
Reviewers: alexfh, aaron.ballman, hokein
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: lebedev.ri, Eugene.Zelenko, cfe-commits, mgorny, JDevlieghere, xazax.hun
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37808
llvm-svn: 318600
|
