| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This change moves tests for checkers and infrastructure into separate
directories, making it easier to find infrastructure tests. Tests for
checkers are already easy to find because they are named after the
checker. Tests for infrastructure were difficult to find because they
were outnumbered by tests for checkers. Now they are in a separate
directory.
Reviewers: jfb, jdoerfert, lebedev.ri
Subscribers: srhines, nemanjai, aheejin, kbarton, christof, mgrang, arphaman, jfb, lebedev.ri, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68807
llvm-svn: 374540
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Before the patch calling clang-tidy with -header-filter=.* -system-headers would
result in a few hundred useless warnings:
warning: macro '_GNU_SOURCE' used to declare a constant; consider using a 'constexpr' constant [cppcoreguidelines-macro-usage]
warning: macro '_LP64' used to declare a constant; consider using a 'constexpr' constant [cppcoreguidelines-macro-usage]
warning: macro '__ATOMIC_ACQUIRE' used to declare a constant; consider using a 'constexpr' constant [cppcoreguidelines-macro-usage]
warning: macro '__ATOMIC_ACQ_REL' used to declare a constant; consider using a 'constexpr' constant [cppcoreguidelines-macro-usage]
warning: macro '__ATOMIC_CONSUME' used to declare a constant; consider using a 'constexpr' constant [cppcoreguidelines-macro-usage]
warning: macro '__ATOMIC_RELAXED' used to declare a constant; consider using a 'constexpr' constant [cppcoreguidelines-macro-usage]
warning: macro '__ATOMIC_RELEASE' used to declare a constant; consider using a 'constexpr' constant [cppcoreguidelines-macro-usage]
warning: macro '__ATOMIC_SEQ_CST' used to declare a constant; consider using a 'constexpr' constant [cppcoreguidelines-macro-usage]
warning: macro '__BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT__' used to declare a constant; consider using a 'constexpr' constant [cppcoreguidelines-macro-usage]
... and so on
llvm-svn: 358621
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
The macro may not have location (or more generally, the location may not exist),
e.g. if it originates from compiler's command-line.
The check complains on all the macros, even those without the location info.
Which means, it only says it does not like it. What is 'it'? I have no idea.
If we don't print the name, then there is no way to deal with that situation.
And in general, not printing name here forces the user to try to understand,
given, the macro definition location, what is the macro name?
This isn't fun.
Also, ignores-by-default the macros originating from command-line,
with an option to not ignore those.
I suspect some more issues may crop up later.
Reviewers: JonasToth, aaron.ballman, hokein, xazax.hun, alexfh
Reviewed By: JonasToth, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: nemanjai, kbarton, rnkovacs, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53817
llvm-svn: 345610
|
|
|
Summary:
In short macros are discouraged by multiple rules (and sometimes reference randomly). [Enum.1], [ES.30], [ES.31]
This check allows only headerguards and empty macros for annotation.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, hokein
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: jbcoe, Eugene.Zelenko, klimek, nemanjai, mgorny, xazax.hun, kbarton, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41648
llvm-svn: 344940
|
