| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The core engine of clang-rename will be used for local and global renames in the
new refactoring engine, as mentioned in
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2017-June/054286.html.
The clang-rename tool is still supported but might get deprecated in the future.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34696
llvm-svn: 306840
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
looking for a point
Due to the way the preprocessor works nodes can be half in a macro or a
different file. This means checking the file name of the start location
of a Decl is not a correct way of checking if the entire Decl is in that
file. Remove that flawed assumption and replace it with a more effective
check: If the point we're looking for is *inside* of the begin and end
location of a Decl, look inside.
This should make clang-rename more reliable (for example macro'd namespaces
threw it off before, as seen in the test case) and maybe a little faster
by pruning off more stuff that the RecursiveASTVisitor doesn't have to
drill into.
llvm-svn: 287649
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The only difference between some tests is -offset passed to clang-rename. It
makes sense to merge them into a single file and add multiple tool invocations.
Reviewers: alexfh
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23158
llvm-svn: 278221
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Revert r276836, which resulted in tests passing regardless of the actual tool
replacements.
llvm-svn: 277354
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Rather than copying the file and then doing an in-place edit, perform the
replacements to stdout and pass the output to FileCheck directly. Avoids
unnecessary copying and seds.
llvm-svn: 276836
|
|
|
Make yet unsupported tests marked with FIXME pass so that buildbot doesn't fail.
llvm-svn: 275556
|
