| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
token-before-cursor if token-after-cursor fails."
This reverts commit a0ff8cd631add513423fc2d8afa49e9650d01fe3.
Buildbot failures I can't chase further tonight.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
token-after-cursor fails.
This reverts commit 8f876d5105507f874c0fb86bc779c9853eab3fe2.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
token-before-cursor if token-after-cursor fails."
This reverts commit 2500a8d5d8813a3e31fc9ba8dd45e211439a1e3d.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
token-after-cursor fails.
This reverts commit f0604e73a4daa35a10eb17a998657d6c4bd0e971
The issue with movability of Tweak::Selection was addressed in 7dc388bd9596bbf42633f8a8e450224e39740b60
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
token-after-cursor fails."
This reverts commit b60896fad926754f715acc5d771555aaaa577e0f.
Breaks building with gcc:
/usr/include/c++/7/bits/stl_construct.h:75:7: error: use of deleted function ‘clang::clangd::Tweak::Selection::Selection(const clang::clangd::Tweak::Selection&)’
{ ::new(static_cast<void*>(__p)) _T1(std::forward<_Args>(__args)...); }
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from /home/buildslave/buildslave/clang-cmake-armv7-selfhost-neon/llvm/clang-tools-extra/clangd/ClangdServer.h:28:0,
from /home/buildslave/buildslave/clang-cmake-armv7-selfhost-neon/llvm/clang-tools-extra/clangd/ClangdServer.cpp:9:
/home/buildslave/buildslave/clang-cmake-armv7-selfhost-neon/llvm/clang-tools-extra/clangd/refactor/Tweak.h:49:10: note: ‘clang::clangd::Tweak::Selection::Selection(const clang::clangd::Tweak::Selection&)’ is implicitly deleted because the default definition would be ill-formed:
struct Selection {
^~~~~~~~~
/home/buildslave/buildslave/clang-cmake-armv7-selfhost-neon/llvm/clang-tools-extra/clangd/refactor/Tweak.h:49:10: error: use of deleted function ‘clang::clangd::SelectionTree::SelectionTree(const clang::clangd::SelectionTree&)’
In file included from /home/buildslave/buildslave/clang-cmake-armv7-selfhost-neon/llvm/clang-tools-extra/clangd/refactor/Tweak.h:25:0,
from /home/buildslave/buildslave/clang-cmake-armv7-selfhost-neon/llvm/clang-tools-extra/clangd/ClangdServer.h:28,
from /home/buildslave/buildslave/clang-cmake-armv7-selfhost-neon/llvm/clang-tools-extra/clangd/ClangdServer.cpp:9:
/home/buildslave/buildslave/clang-cmake-armv7-selfhost-neon/llvm/clang-tools-extra/clangd/Selection.h:96:3: note: declared here
SelectionTree(const SelectionTree &) = delete;
^~~~~~~~~~~~~
e.g. here:
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-cmake-armv7-selfhost-neon/builds/2714
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-ppc64be-linux/builds/41866
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
The problem:
LSP specifies that Positions are between characters. Therefore when a position
(or an empty range) is used to target elements of the source code, there is an
ambiguity - should we look left or right of the cursor?
Until now, SelectionTree resolved this to the right except in trivial cases
(where there's whitespace, semicolon, or eof on the right).
This meant that it's unable to e.g. out-line `int foo^()` today.
Complicating this, LSP notwithstanding the cursor is *on* a character in many
editors (mostly terminal-based). In these cases there's no ambiguity - we must
"look right" - but there's also no way to tell in LSP.
(Several features currently resolve this by using getBeginningOfIdentifier,
which tries to rewind and supports end-of-identifier. But this relies on
raw lexing and is limited and buggy).
Precedent: well - most other languages aren't so full of densely packed symbols
that we might want to target. Bias-towards-identifier works well enough.
MS C++ for vscode seems to mostly use bias-toward-identifier too.
The problem with this solution is it doesn't provide any way to target some
things such as the constructor call in Foo^(bar());
Presented solution:
When an ambiguous selection is found, we generate *both* possible selection
trees. We try to run the feature on the rightward tree first, and then on the
leftward tree if it fails.
This is basically do-what-I-mean, the main downside is the need to do this on
a feature-by-feature basis (because each feature knows what "fail" means).
The most complicated instance of this is Tweaks, where the preferred selection
may vary tweak-by-tweak.
Wrinkles:
While production behavior is pretty consistent, this introduces some
inconsistency in testing, depending whether the interface we're testing is
inside or outside the "retry" wrapper.
In particular, for many features like Hover, the unit tests will show production
behavior, while for Tweaks the harness would have to run the loop itself if
we want this.
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, usaxena95, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71345
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Incoming define out-of-line tweak requires access to index.
This patch simply propogates the index in ClangdServer to Tweak::Selection while
passing the AST. Also updates TweakTest to accommodate this change.
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, usaxena95, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69165
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Incoming define out-of-line tweak requires access to index.
This patch simply propogates the index in ClangdServer to Tweak::Selection while
passing the AST. Also updates TweakTest to accommodate this change.
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, usaxena95, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69165
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
First patch for propogating multifile changes from tweak outputs to LSP
WorkspaceEdits.
Uses SM to convert tooling::Replacements to TextEdits.
Errors out if there are any inconsistencies between the draft version and the
version generated the edits.
Reviewers: sammccall
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66637
llvm-svn: 371392
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Whitespace and comments are a clear bugfix: selecting some
comments/space near a statement doesn't mean you're selecting the
surrounding block.
Semicolons are less obvious, but for similar reasons: these tokens
aren't actually claimed by any AST node (usually), so an AST-based model
like SelectionTree shouldn't take them into account.
Callers may still sometimes care about semis of course:
- when the selection is an expr with a non-expr parent, selection of
the semicolon indicates intent to select the statement.
- when a statement with a trailing semi is selected, we need to know
its range to ensure it can be removed.
SelectionTree may or may not play a role here, but these are separate questions
from its core function of describing which AST nodes were selected.
The mechanism here is the TokenBuffer from syntax-trees. We use it in a
fairly low-level way (just to get boundaries of raw spelled tokens). The
actual mapping of AST nodes to coordinates continues to use the (fairly
mature) SourceLocation based logic. TokenBuffer/Syntax trees
don't currently offer an alternative to getFileRange(), I think.
Reviewers: SureYeaah, kadircet
Subscribers: MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, cfe-commits, ilya-biryukov
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65486
llvm-svn: 367453
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
- For now, we don't trigger in any case if it's an empty selection
- Fixed unittests
Reviewers: kadircet, sammccall
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64912
llvm-svn: 366451
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary: Previously, we ran the prepare, even for the tweaks that are disabled.
Reviewers: sammccall
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64565
llvm-svn: 365882
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 361883
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This patch contains two parts:
1) reverts commit r353306.
2) move the format logic out from tweaks, keep tweaks API unchanged.
Reviewers: sammccall, ilya-biryukov
Reviewed By: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58051
llvm-svn: 353712
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 353306
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This reduces the per-check implementation burden and redundant work.
It also makes checks range-aware by default (treating the commonAncestor
as if it were a point selection should be good baseline behavior).
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57570
llvm-svn: 352876
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Strings are complicated, giving them opaque names makes us forget
they're complicated.
llvm-svn: 352837
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 352511
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
For failures see:
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-x86_64-linux-abi-test/builds/38501/steps/build-unified-tree/logs/stdio
llvm-svn: 352510
|
|
Summary:
The code tweaks are an implementation of mini-refactorings exposed
via the LSP code actions. They run in two stages:
- Stage 1. Decides whether the action is available to the user and
collects all the information required to finish the action.
Should be cheap, since this will run over all the actions known to
clangd on each textDocument/codeAction request from the client.
- Stage 2. Uses information from stage 1 to produce the actual edits
that the code action should perform. This stage can be expensive and
will only run if the user chooses to perform the specified action in
the UI.
One unfortunate consequence of this change is increased latency of
processing the textDocument/codeAction requests, which now wait for an
AST. However, we cannot avoid this with what we have available in the LSP
today.
Reviewers: kadircet, ioeric, hokein, sammccall
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: mgrang, mgorny, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56267
llvm-svn: 352494
|