| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 372752
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The new guideline is to qualify with 'llvm::' explicitly both in
'.h' and '.cpp' files. This simplifies moving the code between
header and source files and is easier to keep consistent.
llvm-svn: 350531
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This improves cross-namespace completions and has ignorable
impact on other completion types.
Metrics
```
==================================================================================================
OVERALL (excl. CROSS_NAMESPACE)
==================================================================================================
Total measurements: 109367 (-6)
All measurements:
MRR: 68.11 (+0.04) Top-1: 58.59% (+0.03%) Top-5: 80.00% (+0.01%) Top-100: 95.92% (-0.02%)
Full identifiers:
MRR: 98.35 (+0.09) Top-1: 97.87% (+0.17%) Top-5: 98.96% (+0.01%) Top-100: 99.03% (+0.00%)
Filter length 0-5:
MRR: 23.20 (+0.05) 58.72 (+0.01) 70.16 (-0.03) 73.44 (+0.03) 76.24 (+0.00) 80.79 (+0.14)
Top-1: 11.90% (+0.03%) 45.07% (+0.03%) 58.49% (-0.05%) 62.44% (-0.02%) 66.31% (-0.05%) 72.10% (+0.07%)
Top-5: 35.51% (+0.08%) 76.94% (-0.01%) 85.10% (-0.13%) 87.40% (-0.02%) 88.65% (+0.01%) 91.84% (+0.17%)
Top-100: 83.25% (-0.02%) 96.61% (-0.15%) 98.15% (-0.02%) 98.43% (-0.01%) 98.53% (+0.01%) 98.66% (+0.02%)
==================================================================================================
CROSS_NAMESPACE
==================================================================================================
Total measurements: 17702 (+27)
All measurements:
MRR: 28.12 (+3.26) Top-1: 21.07% (+2.70%) Top-5: 35.11% (+4.48%) Top-100: 74.31% (+1.02%)
Full identifiers:
MRR: 79.20 (+3.72) Top-1: 71.78% (+4.86%) Top-5: 88.39% (+2.84%) Top-100: 98.99% (+0.00%)
Filter length 0-5:
MRR: 0.92 (-0.10) 5.51 (+0.57) 18.30 (+2.34) 21.62 (+3.76) 32.00 (+6.00) 41.55 (+7.61)
Top-1: 0.56% (-0.08%) 2.44% (+0.15%) 9.82% (+1.47%) 12.59% (+2.16%) 21.17% (+4.47%) 30.05% (+6.72%)
Top-5: 1.20% (-0.15%) 7.14% (+1.04%) 25.17% (+3.91%) 29.74% (+5.90%) 43.29% (+9.59%) 54.75% (+9.79%)
Top-100: 5.49% (-0.01%) 56.22% (+2.59%) 86.69% (+1.08%) 89.03% (+2.04%) 93.74% (+0.78%) 96.99% (+0.59%)
```
Reviewers: sammccall
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54851
llvm-svn: 347548
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Standardize on the most common namespace setup in our *.cpp files:
using namespace llvm;
namespace clang {
namespace clangd {
void foo(StringRef) { ... }
And remove redundant llvm:: qualifiers. (Except for cases like
make_unique where this causes problems with std:: and ADL).
This choice is pretty arbitrary, but some broad consistency is nice.
This is going to conflict with everything. Sorry :-/
Squash the other configurations:
A)
using namespace llvm;
using namespace clang;
using namespace clangd;
void clangd::foo(StringRef);
This is in some of the older files. (It prevents accidentally defining a
new function instead of one in the header file, for what that's worth).
B)
namespace clang {
namespace clangd {
void foo(llvm::StringRef) { ... }
This is fine, but in practice the using directive often gets added over time.
C)
namespace clang {
namespace clangd {
using namespace llvm; // inside the namespace
This was pretty common, but is a bit misleading: name lookup preferrs
clang::clangd::foo > clang::foo > llvm:: foo (no matter where the using
directive is).
llvm-svn: 344850
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This should make all-scope completion more usable. Scope proximity for
indexes will be added in followup patch.
Reviewers: sammccall
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53131
llvm-svn: 344688
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This is useful for symbo scope proximity, where down traversals from
the global scope if not desired.
Reviewers: sammccall
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53317
llvm-svn: 344604
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 343946
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Didn't rename another variable reference.
llvm-svn: 341184
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Reviewed by: sammccall
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51527
llvm-svn: 341182
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
log() is split into four functions:
- elog()/log()/vlog() have different severity levels, allowing filtering
- dlog() is a lazy macro which uses LLVM_DEBUG - it logs to the logger, but
conditionally based on -debug-only flag and is omitted in release builds
All logging functions use formatv-style format strings now, e.g:
log("Could not resolve URI {0}: {1}", URI, Result.takeError());
Existing log sites have been split between elog/log/vlog by best guess.
This includes a workaround for passing Error to formatv that can be
simplified when D49170 or similar lands.
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, javed.absar, ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49008
llvm-svn: 336785
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 336246
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 336242
|
|
Summary:
We now compute a distance from the main file to the symbol header, which
is a weighted count of:
- some number of #include traversals from source file --> included file
- some number of FS traversals from file --> parent directory
- some number of FS traversals from parent directory --> child file/dir
This calculation is performed in the appropriate URI scheme.
This means we'll get some proximity boost from header files in main-file
contexts, even when these are in different directory trees.
This extended file proximity model is not yet incorporated in the index
interface/implementation.
Reviewers: ioeric
Subscribers: mgorny, ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48441
llvm-svn: 336177
|