| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
repeated field
Summary:
Finds calls that add element to protobuf repeated field in a loop
without calling Reserve() before the loop. Calling Reserve() first can avoid
unnecessary memory reallocations.
A new option EnableProto is added to guard this feature.
Patch by Cong Liu!
Reviewers: gribozavr, alexfh, hokein, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: hokein
Subscribers: lebedev.ri, xazax.hun, Eugene.Zelenko, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang, #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67135
llvm-svn: 371963
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 356892
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
inefficient-vector-operation check.
Summary:
Also add an option "VectorLikeClasses" allowing user specify customized
vectors.
Reviewers: alexfh, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: alexfh
Subscribers: Eugene.Zelenko, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32436
llvm-svn: 301440
|
|
|
Summary:
The "performance-inefficient-vector-operation" check finds vector oprations in
for-loop statements which may cause multiple memory reallocations.
This is the first version, only detects typical for-loop:
```
std::vector<int> v;
for (int i = 0; i < n; ++i) {
v.push_back(i);
}
// or
for (int i = 0; i < v2.size(); ++i) {
v.push_back(v2[i]);
}
```
We can extend it to handle more cases like for-range loop in the future.
Reviewers: alexfh, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: zaks.anna, Eugene.Zelenko, mgorny, cfe-commits, djasper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31757
llvm-svn: 300534
|
