| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
OSSpinLock* are Apple/Darwin functions, but were previously located with ObjC checks as those were most closely tied to Apple platforms before.
Now that there's a specific Darwin module, relocating the check there.
This change was prepared by running rename_check.py.
Contributed By: mwyman
Reviewers: stephanemoore, dmaclach
Reviewed By: stephanemoore
Subscribers: Eugene.Zelenko, mgorny, xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra, #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68148
llvm-svn: 373392
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Apple documentation states that:
"If two objects are equal, they must have the same hash value. This last
point is particularly important if you define isEqual: in a subclass and
intend to put instances of that subclass into a collection. Make sure
you also define hash in your subclass."
https://developer.apple.com/documentation/objectivec/1418956-nsobject/1418795-isequal?language=objc
In many or all versions of libobjc, -[NSObject isEqual:] is a pointer
equality check and -[NSObject hash] returns the messaged object's
pointer. A relatively common form of developer error is for a developer to
override -isEqual: in a subclass without overriding -hash to ensure that
hashes are equal for objects that are equal.
It is assumed that an override of -isEqual: is a strong signal for
changing the object's equality operator to something other than pointer
equality which implies that a missing override of -hash could result in
distinct objects being equal but having distinct hashes because they are
independent instances. This added check flags classes that override
-isEqual: but inherit NSObject's implementation of -hash to warn of the
potential for unexpected behavior.
The proper implementation of -hash is the responsibility of the
developer and the check will only verify that the developer made an
effort to properly implement -hash. Developers can set up unit tests
to verify that their implementation of -hash is appropriate.
Test Notes:
Ran check-clang-tools.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, benhamilton
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: Eugene.Zelenko, mgorny, xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67737
llvm-svn: 372445
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This check aims to address a relatively common benign error where
Objective-C subclass initializers call -self on their superclass instead
of invoking a superclass initializer, typically -init. The error is
typically benign because libobjc recognizes that improper initializer
chaining is common¹.
One theory for the frequency of this error might be that -init and -self
have the same return type which could potentially cause inappropriate
autocompletion to -self instead of -init. The equal selector lengths and
triviality of common initializer code probably contribute to errors like
this slipping through code review undetected.
This check aims to flag errors of this form in the interests of
correctness and reduce incidence of initialization failing to chain to
-[NSObject init].
[1] "In practice, it will be hard to rely on this function.
Many classes do not properly chain -init calls."
From _objc_rootInit in https://opensource.apple.com/source/objc4/objc4-750.1/runtime/NSObject.mm.auto.html.
Test Notes:
Verified via `make check-clang-tools`.
Subscribers: mgorny, xazax.hun, jdoerfert, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59806
llvm-svn: 358620
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This check will find out improper initialization of NSError objects.
According to Apple developer document, we should always use factory method errorWithDomain:code:userInfo: to create new NSError objects instead of [NSError alloc] init]. Otherwise it will lead to a warning message during runtime in Xcode.
The corresponding information about NSError creation: https://developer.apple.com/library/content/documentation/Cocoa/Conceptual/ErrorHandlingCocoa/CreateCustomizeNSError/CreateCustomizeNSError.html
Reviewers: hokein, benhamilton
Reviewed By: benhamilton
Subscribers: klimek, mgorny, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40528
llvm-svn: 319459
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This check finds the use of methods related to OSSpinlock in Objective-C code, which should be deprecated due to livelock issues.
The following method call will be detected:
- OSSpinlockLock()
- OSSpinlockTry()
- OSSpinlockUnlcok()
Reviewers: hokein, benhamilton
Reviewed By: benhamilton
Subscribers: klimek, cfe-commits, mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40325
llvm-svn: 319098
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This check finds property declarations in Objective-C files that do not follow the pattern of property names in Apple's programming guide. The property name should be in the format of Lower Camel Case or with some particular acronyms as prefix.
Example:
@property(nonatomic, assign) int lowerCamelCase;
@property(nonatomic, strong) NSString *URLString;
Test plan: ninja check-clang-tools
Reviewers: benhamilton, hokein
Reviewed By: hokein
Subscribers: cfe-commits, mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39829
llvm-svn: 318117
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This is part 3 of 3 of a series of changes to improve Objective-C
linting in clang-tidy.
This adds a new clang-tidy check `objc-forbidden-subclassing` which
ensures clients do not create subclasses of Objective-C classes which
are not designed to be subclassed.
(Note that for code under your control, you should use
__attribute__((objc_subclassing_restricted)) instead -- this
is intended for third-party APIs which cannot be modified.)
By default, the following classes (which are publicly documented
as not supporting subclassing) are forbidden from subclassing:
ABNewPersonViewController
ABPeoplePickerNavigationController
ABPersonViewController
ABUnknownPersonViewController
NSHashTable
NSMapTable
NSPointerArray
NSPointerFunctions
NSTimer
UIActionSheet
UIAlertView
UIImagePickerController
UITextInputMode
UIWebView
Clients can set a CheckOption
`objc-forbidden-subclassing.ClassNames` to a semicolon-separated
list of class names, which overrides this list.
Test Plan: `ninja check-clang-tools`
Patch by Ben Hamilton!
Reviewers: hokein, alexfh
Reviewed By: hokein
Subscribers: saidinwot, Wizard, srhines, mgorny, xazax.hun
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39142
llvm-svn: 316744
|
|
|
Summary:
This is part 1 of 3 of a series of changes to improve Objective-C
linting in clang-tidy.
This introduces a new clang-tidy module, `objc`, specifically for
Objective-C / Objective-C++ checks.
The module is currently empty; D39142 adds the first check.
Test Plan: `ninja check-clang-tools`
Patch by Ben Hamilton!
Reviewers: hokein, alexfh
Reviewed By: hokein
Subscribers: Wizard, mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39188
llvm-svn: 316643
|
