| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Based on corrections mentioned in patch for clang for PR27635
llvm-svn: 299074
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
checker
Summary:
Hello everybody,
this is an incremental patch for the NoMalloc-Checker I wrote. It allows to configure the memory-management functions, that are checked,
This might be helpful for a code base with custom functions in use, or non-standard functionality, like posix_memalign.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, hokein, alexfh
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, alexfh
Subscribers: sbenza, nemanjai, JDevlieghere
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Patch by Jonas Toth!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28239
llvm-svn: 296734
|
|
|
Summary:
This checker flags the use of C-style memory management functionality and notes about modern alternatives.
In an earlier revision it tried to autofix some kind of patterns, but that was a bad idea. Since memory management can be so widespread in a program, manual updating is most likely necessary.
Maybe for special cases, there could be later additions to this basic checker.
This is the first checker I wrote and I never did something with clang (only compiling programs). So whenever I missed conventions or did plain retarded stuff, feel free to point it out! I am willing to fix them and write a better checker.
I hope the patch does work, I never did this either. On a testapply in my repository it did, but I am pretty unconfident in my patching skills :)
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, hokein, alexfh, malcolm.parsons
Subscribers: cfe-commits, JDevlieghere, nemanjai, Eugene.Zelenko, Prazek, mgorny, modocache
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26167
Patch by Jonas Toth!
llvm-svn: 289546
|
