summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/SCCP.cpp
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/SCCP.cpp')
-rw-r--r--llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/SCCP.cpp54
1 files changed, 40 insertions, 14 deletions
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/SCCP.cpp b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/SCCP.cpp
index 4093e50ce89..2aaeb50a757 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/SCCP.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/SCCP.cpp
@@ -1465,7 +1465,24 @@ bool SCCPSolver::ResolvedUndefsIn(Function &F) {
}
LatticeVal &LV = getValueState(&I);
- if (!LV.isUnknown()) continue;
+ if (!LV.isUnknown())
+ continue;
+
+ // There are two reasons a call can have an undef result
+ // 1. It could be tracked.
+ // 2. It could be constant-foldable.
+ // Because of the way we solve return values, tracked calls must
+ // never be marked overdefined in ResolvedUndefsIn.
+ if (CallSite CS = CallSite(&I)) {
+ if (Function *F = CS.getCalledFunction())
+ if (TrackedRetVals.count(F))
+ continue;
+
+ // If the call is constant-foldable, we mark it overdefined because
+ // we do not know what return values are valid.
+ markOverdefined(&I);
+ return true;
+ }
// extractvalue is safe; check here because the argument is a struct.
if (isa<ExtractValueInst>(I))
@@ -1638,19 +1655,7 @@ bool SCCPSolver::ResolvedUndefsIn(Function &F) {
case Instruction::Call:
case Instruction::Invoke:
case Instruction::CallBr:
- // There are two reasons a call can have an undef result
- // 1. It could be tracked.
- // 2. It could be constant-foldable.
- // Because of the way we solve return values, tracked calls must
- // never be marked overdefined in ResolvedUndefsIn.
- if (Function *F = CallSite(&I).getCalledFunction())
- if (TrackedRetVals.count(F))
- break;
-
- // If the call is constant-foldable, we mark it overdefined because
- // we do not know what return values are valid.
- markOverdefined(&I);
- return true;
+ llvm_unreachable("Call-like instructions should have be handled early");
default:
// If we don't know what should happen here, conservatively mark it
// overdefined.
@@ -1924,6 +1929,27 @@ static void findReturnsToZap(Function &F,
return;
}
+ assert(
+ all_of(F.users(),
+ [&Solver](User *U) {
+ if (isa<Instruction>(U) &&
+ !Solver.isBlockExecutable(cast<Instruction>(U)->getParent()))
+ return true;
+ // Non-callsite uses are not impacted by zapping. Also, constant
+ // uses (like blockaddresses) could stuck around, without being
+ // used in the underlying IR, meaning we do not have lattice
+ // values for them.
+ if (!CallSite(U))
+ return true;
+ if (U->getType()->isStructTy()) {
+ return all_of(
+ Solver.getStructLatticeValueFor(U),
+ [](const LatticeVal &LV) { return !LV.isOverdefined(); });
+ }
+ return !Solver.getLatticeValueFor(U).isOverdefined();
+ }) &&
+ "We can only zap functions where all live users have a concrete value");
+
for (BasicBlock &BB : F) {
if (CallInst *CI = BB.getTerminatingMustTailCall()) {
LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "Can't zap return of the block due to present "
OpenPOWER on IntegriCloud