3 files changed, 20 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/clang/lib/Basic/Targets/X86.cpp b/clang/lib/Basic/Targets/X86.cpp
index e295cff9d5d..eaca1811c0f 100644
--- a/clang/lib/Basic/Targets/X86.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/Basic/Targets/X86.cpp
@@ -796,8 +796,6 @@ bool X86TargetInfo::handleTargetFeatures(std::vector<std::string> &Features,
       HasCLDEMOTE = true;
     } else if (Feature == "+rdpid") {
       HasRDPID = true;
-    } else if (Feature == "+retpoline") {
-      HasRetpoline = true;
     } else if (Feature == "+retpoline-external-thunk") {
       HasRetpolineExternalThunk = true;
     } else if (Feature == "+sahf") {
@@ -1397,7 +1395,6 @@ bool X86TargetInfo::hasFeature(StringRef Feature) const {
       .Case("rdpid", HasRDPID)
       .Case("rdrnd", HasRDRND)
       .Case("rdseed", HasRDSEED)
-      .Case("retpoline", HasRetpoline)
       .Case("retpoline-external-thunk", HasRetpolineExternalThunk)
       .Case("rtm", HasRTM)
       .Case("sahf", HasLAHFSAHF)
diff --git a/clang/lib/Basic/Targets/X86.h b/clang/lib/Basic/Targets/X86.h
index 019bc8d51a6..077b5909434 100644
--- a/clang/lib/Basic/Targets/X86.h
+++ b/clang/lib/Basic/Targets/X86.h
@@ -98,7 +98,6 @@ class LLVM_LIBRARY_VISIBILITY X86TargetInfo : public TargetInfo {
   bool HasMOVBE = false;
   bool HasPREFETCHWT1 = false;
   bool HasRDPID = false;
-  bool HasRetpoline = false;
   bool HasRetpolineExternalThunk = false;
   bool HasLAHFSAHF = false;
   bool HasWBNOINVD = false;
diff --git a/clang/lib/Driver/ToolChains/Arch/X86.cpp b/clang/lib/Driver/ToolChains/Arch/X86.cpp
index 7a4f836d2e1..ff2023c2cbe 100644
--- a/clang/lib/Driver/ToolChains/Arch/X86.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/Driver/ToolChains/Arch/X86.cpp
@@ -144,6 +144,26 @@ void x86::getX86TargetFeatures(const Driver &D, const llvm::Triple &Triple,
       Features.push_back("+ssse3");
   }
 
+  // Translate the high level `-mretpoline` flag to the specific target feature
+  // flags. We also detect if the user asked for retpoline external thunks but
+  // failed to ask for retpolines themselves. This is a bit hacky but keeps
+  // existing usages working. We should consider deprecated this and instead
+  // warning if the user requests external retpoline thunks and *doesn't*
+  // request some form of retpolines.
+  if (Args.hasArgNoClaim(options::OPT_mretpoline, options::OPT_mno_retpoline)) {
+    if (Args.hasFlag(options::OPT_mretpoline, options::OPT_mno_retpoline,
+                     false)) {
+      Features.push_back("+retpoline-indirect-calls");
+      Features.push_back("+retpoline-indirect-branches");
+    }
+  } else if (Args.hasFlag(options::OPT_mretpoline_external_thunk,
+                          options::OPT_mno_retpoline_external_thunk, false)) {
+    // FIXME: Add a warning about failing to specify `-mretpoline` and
+    // eventually switch to an error here.
+    Features.push_back("+retpoline-indirect-calls");
+    Features.push_back("+retpoline-indirect-branches");
+  }
+
   // Now add any that the user explicitly requested on the command line,
   // which may override the defaults.
   handleTargetFeaturesGroup(Args, Features, options::OPT_m_x86_Features_Group);